This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
|
dcss:brainstorm:effect:constriction [2012-02-28 19:37] minmay [Gameplay feedback] |
dcss:brainstorm:effect:constriction [2012-03-21 02:56] (current) Raumkraut Slime Creature splitting? |
||
|---|---|---|---|
| Line 283: | Line 283: | ||
| Certain monsters should be excluded as constriction targets. This list begins with Jellies (I just involuntarily constricted one to death with my Naga; Unarmed Combat is penalized, why not Constriction?), but should be expanded. --- //[[user:XuaXua]] 2012-01-06 19:01// | Certain monsters should be excluded as constriction targets. This list begins with Jellies (I just involuntarily constricted one to death with my Naga; Unarmed Combat is penalized, why not Constriction?), but should be expanded. --- //[[user:XuaXua]] 2012-01-06 19:01// | ||
| > Are insubstantial monsters currently excluded? If not, they probably should be, though it's debatable since you can certainly beat them to death with your fists. Jellies don't need to be excluded for the sake of parity with UC, but arguably all amorphous monsters (including those that don't have a passive acid attack, such as oozes) could be immune to constriction as well, though I guess that depends on how viscous one views them as being. -//IonFrigate// | > Are insubstantial monsters currently excluded? If not, they probably should be, though it's debatable since you can certainly beat them to death with your fists. Jellies don't need to be excluded for the sake of parity with UC, but arguably all amorphous monsters (including those that don't have a passive acid attack, such as oozes) could be immune to constriction as well, though I guess that depends on how viscous one views them as being. -//IonFrigate// | ||
| + | |||
| + | ==== Slime Creatures ==== | ||
| + | |||
| + | Perhaps constriction should have a chance of splitting apart (partially or wholly) merged slime creatures? --- //[[user:Raumkraut]] 2012-03-21 02:50// | ||