This is what's wrong with Rune Lock


Ask fellow adventurers how to stay alive in the deep, dark, dangerous dungeon below, or share your own accumulated wisdom.

Vestibule Violator

Posts: 1500

Joined: Monday, 3rd January 2011, 17:47

Post Monday, 11th November 2013, 14:40

This is what's wrong with Rune Lock

Granted, I'm in .13 and from what I understand, the uniques list has been changed for the branches. Nonetheless, between the unfavorable terrain in the branches, your expected consumables and the comparative danger level of the dungeon and the power level of a GrMo, you'd have to be extremely good to be able to rune lock consistently. You need the XP from clearing floors but when half of each floor is covered with dangerous uniques, good luck getting enough XP to make it past the rune vault.
Shoals:2 Louise, Polyphemus
Shoals:3 exclusion: Roxanne, Roxanne, Rupert
Spider:2 Kirke, Snorg
Spider:4 Arachne, Norris


BTW, this doesn't even include some other "dangerous" uniques that I already took out which might have been difficult for others.
Nikola (Shoals:1)
Donald (Spider:1)


Full morgue, in case you think I don't know how to build a character. And yes, I know the armour need to be changed.

For this message the author rebthor has received thanks:
Sandman25
User avatar

Vestibule Violator

Posts: 1591

Joined: Saturday, 3rd August 2013, 18:59

Post Monday, 11th November 2013, 15:42

Re: This is what's wrong with Rune Lock

I think I've said he phrase "rune lock would work if you removed all the uniques to make it more insistent" about 7 or 8 times. Seriously, dev team, Nikola does it belong in shaols, and Louise does not belong in swamp. Don't even get me started on mennas in snake pits...
To all new players: Ignore all strategy guides posted on the wiki, ask questions in the Advice forum, players with lots of posts normally have the best advice.

crawl.akrasiac.org:8080 <- take this link to play online or spectate.

Ziggurat Zagger

Posts: 11111

Joined: Friday, 8th February 2013, 12:00

Post Monday, 11th November 2013, 15:49

Re: This is what's wrong with Rune Lock

It looks like many middle/late game uniques should be changed. For example
Spoiler: show
NAME: uniq_agnes
DEPTH: D:14-22, Elf, Swamp, Snake, Shoals, Spider, Vaults:1-4, Crypt:1-3, Forest:1-3, Blade, Tomb:1


implies that Swamp, Snake, Shoals, Spider are in the same category as D14-D22.

Other examples:

Spoiler: show
NAME: uniq_frances
DEPTH: D:17-, Elf:2-, Swamp:2-, Snake:2-, Shoals:2-, Spider:2-, Vaults, Crypt, Forest, Blade, Tomb
NAME: uniq_jorgrun
DEPTH: D:17-, Elf:2-, Swamp:2-, Snake:2-, Shoals:2-, Spider:2-, Vaults, Crypt, Forest, Blade, Tomb

Cocytus Succeeder

Posts: 2229

Joined: Sunday, 18th December 2011, 13:31

Post Monday, 11th November 2013, 15:54

Re: This is what's wrong with Rune Lock

The issue with unique excessively dangerous uniques (e.g. mennas) has already been resolved
f5560fb | David Ploog | 2013-11-02 03:42:55 +0100

Exclude certain uniques from Swamp/Snake/Shoals/Spider ends.
This addressed precisely which could only appear on the last level:
Boris, Frederick, Jory, Margery, Mennas, Sojobo, Xtahua.

In the op list, I can say that Louise, Roxanne, Snorg, Norris and probably Kirke too can appear around D:15ish,Ruper can surely even appear in Lair. Therefore, there isn't differences in meeting them there on in Lairs' branches (for most of those uniques, the terrain is a problem as much as for the character, so you are actually advantaged to fight them in place like Shoal or Spider) -
screw it I hate this character I'm gonna go melee Gastronok

Vestibule Violator

Posts: 1500

Joined: Monday, 3rd January 2011, 17:47

Post Monday, 11th November 2013, 16:20

Re: This is what's wrong with Rune Lock

nago wrote:The issue with unique excessively dangerous uniques (e.g. mennas) has already been resolved
f5560fb | David Ploog | 2013-11-02 03:42:55 +0100

Exclude certain uniques from Swamp/Snake/Shoals/Spider ends.
This addressed precisely which could only appear on the last level:
Boris, Frederick, Jory, Margery, Mennas, Sojobo, Xtahua.

In the op list, I can say that Louise, Roxanne, Snorg, Norris and probably Kirke too can appear around D:15ish,Ruper can surely even appear in Lair. Therefore, there isn't differences in meeting them there on in Lairs' branches (for most of those uniques, the terrain is a problem as much as for the character, so you are actually advantaged to fight them in place like Shoal or Spider) -

Actually, the terrain is probably better in the dungeon for all of them, certainly spider is not advantageous for any of them. Shoals only is because I have permaflight. And the other big difference is that if one of them shows on a floor, or more likely many of them because the way the unique placement code seems to work, you can easily go to the next dungeon floor. When stuff like the above happens with runelock, you can easily end up in a situation where you can't go deeper in the branch because there's nowhere to go and you can't clear the floor(s) because of the uniques. Good luck progressing then.

Dungeon Master

Posts: 1613

Joined: Thursday, 16th December 2010, 21:54

Post Monday, 11th November 2013, 16:22

Re: This is what's wrong with Rune Lock

If you think you can't kill those uniques with Fedhas and those items I'm not really sure what to suggest.

Ziggurat Zagger

Posts: 11111

Joined: Friday, 8th February 2013, 12:00

Post Monday, 11th November 2013, 16:30

Re: This is what's wrong with Rune Lock

MarvinPA wrote:If you think you can't kill those uniques with Fedhas and all those items I'm not really sure what to suggest.


The problem is not related to the character.

NAME: uniq_mara
DEPTH: D:18-25, Elf:$, Swamp:3-, Snake:3-, Shoals:3-, Spider:3-, Vaults:2-, Crypt, Forest, Blade, Tomb

NAME: uniq_norris
DEPTH: D:17-19, Elf:2-, Swamp:2-, Snake:2-, Shoals:2-, Spider:2-, Vaults:1-3
: place_unique(_G, "Norris")

NAME: uniq_saint_roka
DEPTH: Orc:$, D:17-, Elf:2-, Swamp:2-, Snake:2-, Shoals:2-, Vaults, Crypt, Forest, Blade, Tomb
: place_unique(_G, "Saint Roka band")

NAME: uniq_wiglaf
DEPTH: D:17-, Elf:2-, Swamp:2-, Snake:2-, Shoals:2-, Spider:2-, Vaults, Crypt, Forest, Blade, Tomb
: place_unique(_G, "Wiglaf")

What to do if Mara and Saint Roka are in Shoals 3, Wiglaf and Norris are in Spider 2?
These uniques cannot be generated in D15-16, that's two extra floors of XP player misses before meeting the uniques.

Dungeon Master

Posts: 3618

Joined: Thursday, 23rd December 2010, 12:43

Post Monday, 11th November 2013, 16:36

Re: This is what's wrong with Rune Lock

Tiktacy wrote:I think I've said he phrase "rune lock would work if you removed all the uniques to make it more insistent" about 7 or 8 times. Seriously, dev team, Nikola does it belong in shaols, and Louise does not belong in swamp. Don't even get me started on mennas in snake pits...

Seriously, Tiktacy, do you want to give decent feedback or whine a bit? Mennas has been removed from Lair subbranches right after the lock was pushed. What about Nikola in Shoals and Louise in Swamp? These are of a many uniques with D:14-19, Elf, Swamp, Spider, Shoals, Snake, Elf, Vaults:1-3 set.
User avatar

Dungeon Master

Posts: 431

Joined: Tuesday, 13th September 2011, 17:34

Post Monday, 11th November 2013, 16:49

Re: This is what's wrong with Rune Lock

Sandman25 wrote:What to do if Mara and Saint Roka are in Shoals 3, Wiglaf and Norris are in Spider 2?

Maybe avoid them? Or use consumables? Or skip the floor?

Oh dang, I forgot, you have to kill literally every monster you find using nothing but tab. Hmm...
User avatar

Vestibule Violator

Posts: 1591

Joined: Saturday, 3rd August 2013, 18:59

Post Monday, 11th November 2013, 16:52

Re: This is what's wrong with Rune Lock

dpeg wrote:
Tiktacy wrote:I think I've said he phrase "rune lock would work if you removed all the uniques to make it more insistent" about 7 or 8 times. Seriously, dev team, Nikola does it belong in shaols, and Louise does not belong in swamp. Don't even get me started on mennas in snake pits...

Seriously, Tiktacy, do you want to give decent feedback or whine a bit? Mennas has been removed from Lair subbranches right after the lock was pushed. What about Nikola in Shoals and Louise in Swamp? These are of a many uniques with D:14-19, Elf, Swamp, Spider, Shoals, Snake, Elf, Vaults:1-3 set.


Ok sorry... The only one I really have a problem with ATM is Nikola because of how suicidal fighting him is without rElec. :x

rElec can be hard to come by, and even more so with less dungeon space. But I guess that isn't too much of a problem since you can always do the other branch...
To all new players: Ignore all strategy guides posted on the wiki, ask questions in the Advice forum, players with lots of posts normally have the best advice.

crawl.akrasiac.org:8080 <- take this link to play online or spectate.

Ziggurat Zagger

Posts: 11111

Joined: Friday, 8th February 2013, 12:00

Post Monday, 11th November 2013, 16:55

Re: This is what's wrong with Rune Lock

ontoclasm wrote:
Sandman25 wrote:What to do if Mara and Saint Roka are in Shoals 3, Wiglaf and Norris are in Spider 2?

Maybe avoid them? Or use consumables? Or skip the floor?

Oh dang, I forgot, you have to kill literally every monster you find using nothing but tab. Hmm...


Yes, those are good ideas and it usually works. But isn't it a good idea to change those uniques too? D18 and Swamp 3 (for Mara) is not in the same category, it probably was in 0.13 but now we have rune lock. Boris was removed from Lair branches but at least you could silence him and didn't need to escape from your clone while misled.

Cocytus Succeeder

Posts: 2229

Joined: Sunday, 18th December 2011, 13:31

Post Monday, 11th November 2013, 17:03

Re: This is what's wrong with Rune Lock

???
What changes if Mara is on D:18 without runelock or Swamp:3 with runelock?

In 0.13, your clearing order should be something like D:13ish -> Lair -> Orc -> D:20ish -> ... - at least, the highest percentage of winning player do so, and probably 100% of best ones.
In 0.14, it must be D:13ish -> Lair -> Orc -> 1 or 2 Lair Branches -> D:20ish -> ...

So, what's the difference? Please notice you can run from her as much in Swamp as D (ok, in swamp is a bit more difficult due to water, but still possible).
screw it I hate this character I'm gonna go melee Gastronok

Ziggurat Zagger

Posts: 3163

Joined: Friday, 6th January 2012, 18:45

Post Monday, 11th November 2013, 17:11

Re: This is what's wrong with Rune Lock

Presumably the difference is that you could go back and do Lair branches if one or more nasty uniques blocked progress in D.

I'm pretty unswayed by this argument, though. Very few uniques present an insurmountable obstacle, and those that really are unbeatable can be avoided. A higher value may need to be placed on key consumables, but that seems like an ok effect to me.

Vestibule Violator

Posts: 1500

Joined: Monday, 3rd January 2011, 17:47

Post Monday, 11th November 2013, 17:24

Re: This is what's wrong with Rune Lock

BlackSheep wrote:Presumably the difference is that you could go back and do Lair branches if one or more nasty uniques blocked progress in D.

I'm pretty unswayed by this argument, though. Very few uniques present an insurmountable obstacle, and those that really are unbeatable can be avoided. A higher value may need to be placed on key consumables, but that seems like an ok effect to me.


It's more that if you lose a floor or two of experience in the dungeon the way it is currently, it's no big deal. If you lose a floor or two of experience without being able to go past wherever, it starts to become a big deal. Right now it would be pretty suicidal to fight Loiuse or Kirke and that's with me getting lucky and getting an MR boost from a potion of beneficial mutation. As it is, I spent 1 extra turn in Loiuse's and had a short little jaunt to the Abyss.

@MarvinPA - I literally just picked up that potion of speed and the healing potions and the agility potions on D:14 and two of the 3 wand of cold came from an Ice Cave that I did after running into all my buds and the surrounding floor on D:12-D:14. As was the wand of fire IIRC although I may have had that unIded and picked it up in shoals.

So yeah, my bad that I made the game harder for myself by going into the branches prior to clearing all the way down to D:14.

Cocytus Succeeder

Posts: 2229

Joined: Sunday, 18th December 2011, 13:31

Post Monday, 11th November 2013, 17:34

Re: This is what's wrong with Rune Lock

You can usually still explore like 80% of floor quite safely, even with a dangerous foe or two wandering around - it's enough to not make insane noise and not rest where a battle took place.
And personally I've already took 2 runes with a char (HOMo, ok it's quite strong combo) and one with FoFi just diving to the last floor of branches (without rpois btw) and I still feel like there's no need at all to get the extra experience those 4 (8) floors could give.
No idea how this thing is affecting "mage" char, though.
screw it I hate this character I'm gonna go melee Gastronok

Ziggurat Zagger

Posts: 3163

Joined: Friday, 6th January 2012, 18:45

Post Monday, 11th November 2013, 17:44

Re: This is what's wrong with Rune Lock

rebthor wrote:So yeah, my bad that I made the game harder for myself by going into the branches prior to clearing all the way down to D:14.

So you're saying you ran into some troublesome enemies, explored elsewhere for a while, and found some consumables that might help?

For this message the author BlackSheep has received thanks: 2
nago, rebthor

Ziggurat Zagger

Posts: 8786

Joined: Sunday, 5th May 2013, 08:25

Post Monday, 11th November 2013, 23:07

Re: This is what's wrong with Rune Lock

Sandman25 wrote:implies that Swamp, Snake, Shoals, Spider are in the same category as D14-D22.
Well that's because they are. Hopefully if the rune lock stays then d:14-22 will be made a lot harder; currently I'd never want to continue playing after getting the rune, for the same reason I wouldn't care to do Lair if I've already cleared Zot.

For this message the author duvessa has received thanks:
Sandman25
User avatar

Dungeon Master

Posts: 762

Joined: Thursday, 25th April 2013, 02:43

Post Tuesday, 12th November 2013, 03:43

Re: This is what's wrong with Rune Lock

duvessa wrote:Hopefully if the rune lock stays then d:14-22 will be made a lot harder; currently I'd never want to continue playing after getting the rune, for the same reason I wouldn't care to do Lair if I've already cleared Zot.
Don't worry, this has already been done in a branch. It isn't in Trunk yet because it breaks save compatibility and the devs are taking advantage for that for internal code clean-up.

On the main topic: rebthor, You've already proven you can bypass levels with multiple dangerous uniques, and you already have Swiftness online to run away. There shouldn't be any problem getting down to the rune level on either branch. I'm pretty sure you can do something like this: clear out all but the rune hut of Shoals:5, build an oklob fort outside, cast swiftness, quaff Brilliance and Haste, read !Tele, open the door, maybe use the fan of gales, cast apportation on the rune once or twice, and then run away/quaff Heal wounds if there's still time on the Tele clock. Even if that exact sequence wouldn't work or gets disrupted, there's plenty of other options that should eventually lead to the rune. This kind of challenge is part of what makes Crawl fun, and this scenario is probably more an argument for the rune lock than against it.
On IRC my nick is reaverb. I play online under the name reaver, though.

Ziggurat Zagger

Posts: 4055

Joined: Tuesday, 10th January 2012, 19:49

Post Tuesday, 12th November 2013, 03:50

Re: This is what's wrong with Rune Lock

The weird thing about unique placement to me is that there are a lot of uniques who can generate on, e.g. d:14-d:19 (plus various lair branch floors).

One of those floors is not like the others.

For this message the author crate has received thanks:
duvessa

Spider Stomper

Posts: 216

Joined: Saturday, 25th December 2010, 20:02

Post Tuesday, 12th November 2013, 21:42

Re: This is what's wrong with Rune Lock

I'm sorry, I'm not understanding what "rune lock" is. This is referring to the action of removing certain uniques from generating on the floors with the runes?
The above post is for entertainment purposes only. If you think anything I ever say is backed by fact, or if you cite things I've said in any argument ever, you are insane.

For this message the author IronJelly has received thanks:
duvessa

Ziggurat Zagger

Posts: 11111

Joined: Friday, 8th February 2013, 12:00

Post Tuesday, 12th November 2013, 21:47

Re: This is what's wrong with Rune Lock

  Code:
Rune lock.

You need a rune to go to D:15. Downstairs of D:14 could be recoloured or replaced by a portal (maybe more consistent with D:27 zot portal).
User avatar

Barkeep

Posts: 4435

Joined: Tuesday, 11th January 2011, 12:28

Post Wednesday, 13th November 2013, 05:13

Re: This is what's wrong with Rune Lock

rebthor wrote:@MarvinPA - I literally just picked up that potion of speed and the healing potions and the agility potions on D:14 and two of the 3 wand of cold came from an Ice Cave that I did after running into all my buds and the surrounding floor on D:12-D:14.


That stuff is great, but I was thinking more about the 20+ fruit you're camping on.
I am not a very good player. My mouth is a foul pit of LIES. KNOW THIS.

Swamp Slogger

Posts: 131

Joined: Saturday, 2nd November 2013, 08:39

Location: Mother Russia

Post Wednesday, 13th November 2013, 07:21

Re: This is what's wrong with Rune Lock

Shouldn't we remove all uniques because of rune lock?
Sigmund can appear as early ad D:3 (or 2?), and I can't take him down with every character I could imagine so I can't get my rune because I can't go to another branch.

Shoals Surfer

Posts: 255

Joined: Sunday, 24th April 2011, 04:13

Post Wednesday, 13th November 2013, 15:58

Re: This is what's wrong with Rune Lock

MDvedh wrote:Shouldn't we remove all uniques because of rune lock?
Sigmund can appear as early ad D:3 (or 2?), and I can't take him down with every character I could imagine so I can't get my rune because I can't go to another branch.

Sigmund is A) easily avoidable, and B) easily defeatable with a little luck in consumables. He's literally just an orc wizard with a bigger HP bar. Louise on the other hand can kill you from anywhere in LOS in one turn. Ilsuiw has a pack of extremely powerful monsters all of which are much faster than a normal speed player.

Anyway the real problem with runelock is this: Previously, I would just run around doing whichever levels were available and comfortable until I was strong enough to be comfortable going for the rune. I almost never did that silly thing of clearing Shoals1-4 and then leaving Shoals5 until much later; now I feel obligated to do precisely that, in order to scrounge up as much XP as possible before entering the rune levels. It has very effectively sucked all the fun out of the entire mid-game.

Not to mention I think it is incredibly awful that Lair is mandatory.

For this message the author Volteccer_Jack has received thanks:
rebthor

Ziggurat Zagger

Posts: 3163

Joined: Friday, 6th January 2012, 18:45

Post Wednesday, 13th November 2013, 16:08

Re: This is what's wrong with Rune Lock

Volteccer_Jack wrote:Not to mention I think it is incredibly awful that Lair is mandatory.

An ability to circumvent the lock is being developed. It just won't be a shaft on D:14 like it briefly was.

Swamp Slogger

Posts: 131

Joined: Saturday, 2nd November 2013, 08:39

Location: Mother Russia

Post Wednesday, 13th November 2013, 16:55

Re: This is what's wrong with Rune Lock

EIlsuiw is easily avoidable
Louise is easily avoidable
Nikola is easily avoidable
Mara is easily avoidable

The only unique i dont think is easily avoidable is Mennas. He can't spawn in lair branches anymore. What's problem?
User avatar

Swamp Slogger

Posts: 143

Joined: Wednesday, 23rd October 2013, 02:30

Post Wednesday, 13th November 2013, 17:21

Re: This is what's wrong with Rune Lock

MDvedh wrote:EIlsuiw is easily avoidable
Louise is easily avoidable
Nikola is easily avoidable
Mara is easily avoidable

The only unique i dont think is easily avoidable is Mennas. He can't spawn in lair branches anymore. What's problem?


Finally! In 0.13 I was playing a game as rune lock, and Mennas was the only thing stopping me from getting the shoals rune.

Ziggurat Zagger

Posts: 11111

Joined: Friday, 8th February 2013, 12:00

Post Wednesday, 13th November 2013, 18:20

Re: This is what's wrong with Rune Lock

MDvedh wrote:EIlsuiw is easily avoidable
Louise is easily avoidable
Nikola is easily avoidable
Mara is easily avoidable

The only unique i dont think is easily avoidable is Mennas. He can't spawn in lair branches anymore. What's problem?


Louise has Banishment.
Also it looks like you never died while petrified after teleport had landed you still in LoS of Jorgrun.

Ziggurat Zagger

Posts: 3163

Joined: Friday, 6th January 2012, 18:45

Post Wednesday, 13th November 2013, 18:23

Re: This is what's wrong with Rune Lock

There are other escape methods besides teleportation.

Ziggurat Zagger

Posts: 11111

Joined: Friday, 8th February 2013, 12:00

Post Wednesday, 13th November 2013, 18:28

Re: This is what's wrong with Rune Lock

BlackSheep wrote:There are other escape methods besides teleportation.


Usually I don't have enough ?Blink for every unique I have to escape from.

Ziggurat Zagger

Posts: 3163

Joined: Friday, 6th January 2012, 18:45

Post Wednesday, 13th November 2013, 18:37

Re: This is what's wrong with Rune Lock

There's also walking.

For this message the author BlackSheep has received thanks: 2
crate, MDvedh

Vestibule Violator

Posts: 1500

Joined: Monday, 3rd January 2011, 17:47

Post Wednesday, 13th November 2013, 18:49

Re: This is what's wrong with Rune Lock

Volteccer_Jack wrote:
MDvedh wrote:Shouldn't we remove all uniques because of rune lock?
Sigmund can appear as early ad D:3 (or 2?), and I can't take him down with every character I could imagine so I can't get my rune because I can't go to another branch.

Sigmund is A) easily avoidable, and B) easily defeatable with a little luck in consumables. He's literally just an orc wizard with a bigger HP bar. Louise on the other hand can kill you from anywhere in LOS in one turn. Ilsuiw has a pack of extremely powerful monsters all of which are much faster than a normal speed player.

Anyway the real problem with runelock is this: Previously, I would just run around doing whichever levels were available and comfortable until I was strong enough to be comfortable going for the rune. I almost never did that silly thing of clearing Shoals1-4 and then leaving Shoals5 until much later; now I feel obligated to do precisely that, in order to scrounge up as much XP as possible before entering the rune levels. It has very effectively sucked all the fun out of the entire mid-game.

Not to mention I think it is incredibly awful that Lair is mandatory.

Thank you, you said my point but more elegantly.

Ziggurat Zagger

Posts: 11111

Joined: Friday, 8th February 2013, 12:00

Post Wednesday, 13th November 2013, 18:58

Re: This is what's wrong with Rune Lock

BlackSheep wrote:There's also walking.


I didn't know it helps vs uniques with Banishment, Petrification, Mislead, Blink and Haste ;)

On a more serious note, going down into unexplored floor is not safe because there is a decent chance that the unqiue you left behind will be here when you return after retreating from another dangerous unique in that floor.

dck

Vestibule Violator

Posts: 1653

Joined: Tuesday, 30th July 2013, 11:29

Post Wednesday, 13th November 2013, 19:49

Re: This is what's wrong with Rune Lock

but it does, against every single one of those uniques you mentioned.
summon corner helps as well.

Ziggurat Zagger

Posts: 11111

Joined: Friday, 8th February 2013, 12:00

Post Wednesday, 13th November 2013, 19:51

Re: This is what's wrong with Rune Lock

dck wrote:but it does, against every single one of those uniques you mentioned.
summon corner helps as well.


Sorry, my experience is different. Maybe I was unlucky but I couldn't walk away in Dungeon after I had been banished ;)

Tomb Titivator

Posts: 853

Joined: Thursday, 29th August 2013, 18:39

Post Wednesday, 13th November 2013, 22:57

Re: This is what's wrong with Rune Lock

Banishment is hardly a death sentence at XL:16, which is about where I end up when doing the lair branches. Are you playing a character who isn't "online" at that point?

Ziggurat Zagger

Posts: 11111

Joined: Friday, 8th February 2013, 12:00

Post Thursday, 14th November 2013, 00:02

Re: This is what's wrong with Rune Lock

johlstei wrote:Banishment is hardly a death sentence at XL:16, which is about where I end up when doing the lair branches. Are you playing a character who isn't "online" at that point?


Nobody says banishment is a death sentence, but it does not increase chance to win either. To me it's like saying Nikola with Lightning Bolt (3d22) is not a big deal because smart player avoids doublezap and has at least 67 HP.

Swamp Slogger

Posts: 131

Joined: Saturday, 2nd November 2013, 08:39

Location: Mother Russia

Post Thursday, 14th November 2013, 07:34

Re: This is what's wrong with Rune Lock

Sandman25 wrote:Louise has Banishment.
Also it looks like you never died while petrified after teleport had landed you still in LoS of Jorgrun.


And Norris (or Rupert, not sure who is who actually) may instaparalyse you when you take downstairs and pack of yaks and black mamba will beat the shit out of you at some level of lair. Still we shouldn't remove or tweak Norris (or Rupert).

Spider Stomper

Posts: 208

Joined: Thursday, 12th September 2013, 15:02

Location: France

Post Thursday, 14th November 2013, 09:00

Re: This is what's wrong with Rune Lock

Sandman25 wrote:Nobody says banishment is a death sentence, but it does not increase chance to win either.
Well, it does increase your XP and give you loot, so ...

Return to Dungeon Crawling Advice

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 51 guests

Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group.
Designed by ST Software for PTF.