Contaminated Chunks


Although the central place for design discussion is ##crawl-dev on freenode, some may find it helpful to discuss requests and suggestions here first.

User avatar

Tomb Titivator

Posts: 857

Joined: Monday, 31st January 2011, 23:19

Post Sunday, 2nd September 2012, 01:50

Contaminated Chunks

If nausea was removed and only carnivores could eat contaminated chunks would the effects be positive or negative?

I find that if you don't berserk often and don't cast really high hunger spells you can survive off just clean chunks and permanent food. Furthermore ring of sustenance is rather common, you can always acquire for food if you need it late game, and there are many outs to surviving if you find yourself without any food... so I think the food clock would be manageable even if contaminated chunks aren't edible.

I'm not really for or against a tight food clock... I just feel nausea punishes the player based on luck and I don't think that is fun. If a centaur gets a lucky hit on you it can be exciting and the luck factor is fun but with nausea it's not exciting at all and just makes you annoyed.

I know most people don't like my suggestions or ideas so thank you for listening and I hope you like this one.

Also this could be expanded a bit... at the moment carnivores are always engorged. Maybe simply allowing them to eat contaminated chunks would be enough if nausea was removed? But they couldn't eat till engorged anymore and Trolls could get a little less hungry all the time too for balance.

Dungeon Master

Posts: 553

Joined: Wednesday, 22nd December 2010, 10:12

Post Sunday, 2nd September 2012, 02:15

Re: Contaminated Chunks

I think it would be better than the current system.

I'm one of those people who doesn't find nausea very annoying... mainly because I don't eat contaminated chunks that often in the first place. When I do, I always have a "backup plan" where I'll just eat permafood instead if I get nausea, or quaff curing if I have a big enough stockpile of those. So no big deal. I prefer it over the old sickness system, only because with nausea I feel there is no pressing need to "rest it off".

That said, what I just described is still bad gameplay. Nausea doesn't really add anything to the game for me. Among my many gripes with Crawl's food system, one big complaint is that it's too demanding of your attention, getting in the way of the more interesting parts of the game. And I don't think the food system should try to be highly-involved, either... in fact, I believe we can make it more "interesting" by stripping away the bad parts as much as we are able to. When I look at roguelikes that have the best food systems, they are always the ones with the most straghtforward systems.

Therefore, I think your suggestion is a good idea: get rid of Nausea from Crawl, and simply make contaminated chunks useless to non-carnivores. Worry about the balance implications later. I suspect there are no serious ones.

Dungeon Master

Posts: 3618

Joined: Thursday, 23rd December 2010, 12:43

Post Sunday, 2nd September 2012, 03:01

Re: Contaminated Chunks

I second this. When I supported and refined the food change programme, I was deluded: it is much harder to come up with interesting choices via eating than it is via combat or stuff that comes up rarely. Perhaps a reason is that food is *not* about consumables (chunks are consumed, but they are infinite in most of the game).

Also, having played Brogue, I was really envious of the tight food clock that game sets up. (Good Brogue players complain that the clock is not nearly tight enough, but I felt the pressure all the time.) It's probably unrealistic to expect something like for Crawl, but slowly tightening the availability of free food (chunks) seems good to me.

Ziggurat Zagger

Posts: 3037

Joined: Sunday, 2nd January 2011, 02:06

Post Sunday, 2nd September 2012, 03:06

Re: Contaminated Chunks

My only complaint about the food clock is that the gap between normal satiation and engorged is way too enormous. Gourmand or carnivore 1 basically triples your safe margin. It isn't too hard to thread the needle between normal satiation and starving even with a high-hunger spellcaster or a healer, but once you have one of those two things it stops being interesting entirely.

To fix that, it seems like a good idea to have carnivore and gourmand only allow you up to full from eating chunks, and rescale the satiation levels above normal so that full comes in at around 3,500 and the rest of them are spaced evenly up until engorged. That way, there's still no chance of wasting nutrition from rations, but the span of the scale under normal use is much shorter.

I never really saw the big deal about nausea. If it keeps me from eating chunks when I have them available, I just use a permafood. I have enough.
User avatar

Crypt Cleanser

Posts: 689

Joined: Sunday, 3rd June 2012, 13:10

Post Sunday, 2nd September 2012, 03:24

Re: Contaminated Chunks

A much replacement for gourmand is sustinence. Both reduce the importance of the food clock, but one requires hitting 'ce' three times as much.

Also, what if carnivore/saprovore were the only way to eat contaminated chunks (and without nausea)? Having more food available for those races seems better than allowing them to eat more often.
Dearest Steve
thanks for the gym equipment
the plane crashed

Dungeon Master

Posts: 553

Joined: Wednesday, 22nd December 2010, 10:12

Post Sunday, 2nd September 2012, 03:54

Re: Contaminated Chunks

Regarding food clock suggestions:

I see the proposal in this thread primarily as a move to streamline the interface, with the effects on the food clock being secondary. It is a minor change which I think can be done by itself (we can worry about all the other stuff later).

It's fine to talk about things like gourmand, satiation levels, etc, but they are really a much broader topic than what this thread initially brought up.

Spider Stomper

Posts: 211

Joined: Thursday, 5th January 2012, 08:32

Post Sunday, 2nd September 2012, 04:08

Re: Contaminated Chunks

It might make contaminated-heavy places early on like orc a nuisance. Not difficult, just a nuisance: which is actually a pretty good summary of the food clock in its current state. That's all it takes to make Ce unpopular.

Snake Sneak

Posts: 103

Joined: Thursday, 21st July 2011, 15:27

Post Sunday, 2nd September 2012, 12:10

Re: Contaminated Chunks

I vote yes on OP suggestion. Nausea and sickness from eating are annoying. Outright restrictions of eating bad meat makes mores sense to keep the game running. There could be more early veggie food vaults placed if there was a concern about non-carnivore nutrition caused by this.

mad

User avatar

Snake Sneak

Posts: 91

Joined: Saturday, 8th January 2011, 00:21

Post Sunday, 2nd September 2012, 12:21

Re: Contaminated Chunks

And perhaps a new food item that can only be eaten by people with the herb mutation if balance could be an issue?

Perhaps the mighty snozzcumber could even be repurposed for this? (After all, I HIGHLY doubt a creature that has a taste for raw chunks of flesh could stomach one of those revolting things. Maybe a particularly large, particularly affable ogre, but that's it...)

Ziggurat Zagger

Posts: 2996

Joined: Tuesday, 28th June 2011, 20:41

Location: Berlin

Post Sunday, 2nd September 2012, 12:39

Re: Contaminated Chunks

In the book where the snozzcumber comes from (Roald Dahl, The BFG) a giant who naturally likes man-flesh (iirc) forces snozzcumbers down for moral reasons and survives on them :P
User avatar

Spider Stomper

Posts: 246

Joined: Thursday, 19th July 2012, 11:07

Post Sunday, 2nd September 2012, 13:09

Problems with Fruit

I would prefer some "cooking" feature than plainly cutting off things like nausea or sickness, but I think I've read about cooking in ideas that will never be implemented. Anyway, if you want less distractions and annoyance it may be a good idea to get rid of hunger at all. You do not lose much, because noone dies from hunger, but it keeps bugging you all the way.

PS
Also, if you kill something with poisonous weapon or spell, the chunks need to be poisoned too.

mad

User avatar

Snake Sneak

Posts: 91

Joined: Saturday, 8th January 2011, 00:21

Post Sunday, 2nd September 2012, 13:11

Re: Contaminated Chunks

@cerebovssquire - yes, that was my joke. I did mention a large, affable ogre, did I not?
User avatar

Dungeon Master

Posts: 4031

Joined: Thursday, 16th December 2010, 20:37

Location: France

Post Sunday, 2nd September 2012, 21:12

Re: Contaminated Chunks

evilmike wrote:I'm one of those people who doesn't find nausea very annoying... mainly because I don't eat contaminated chunks that often in the first place. When I do, I always have a "backup plan" where I'll just eat permafood instead if I get nausea, or quaff curing if I have a big enough stockpile of those. So no big deal. I prefer it over the old sickness system, only because with nausea I feel there is no pressing need to "rest it off".

I feel exactly the same. Nausea is an improvement over sickness, but the OP's proposal is a decent idea. Streamlining the food system is good, I support it.

KoboldLord wrote:My only complaint about the food clock is that the gap between normal satiation and engorged is way too enormous. Gourmand or carnivore 1 basically triples your safe margin.

Actually, carnivore 1 stop at Full, and carni 2 at Very Full. One of the few things which were kept from the food reform, but not very noticeable since no species start with carni 1 or 2. Gourmand could maybe be nerfed to carni 1 or 2 level. And your suggestion of adjusting the hunger scale seems like a good idea too. I think this thing has never been really considered in DCSS history, even during the food reform.
<+Grunt> You dereference an invalid pointer! Ouch! That really hurt! The game dies...

Dungeon Master

Posts: 3618

Joined: Thursday, 23rd December 2010, 12:43

Post Sunday, 2nd September 2012, 23:21

Re: Contaminated Chunks

+1 to galehar (to have some concrete proposal)
User avatar

Tomb Titivator

Posts: 857

Joined: Monday, 31st January 2011, 23:19

Post Monday, 3rd September 2012, 00:35

Re: Contaminated Chunks

I know it's a bit off topic but does carnivore actually need 3 levels?

I could imagine just having 2 levels of carnivore and 2 levels of herbivore could be workable: the extreme cases for trolls ans spriggans then the mild versions for kobolds, felids, and centaurs.

Gourmand at carnivore 1 sounds good if noncarnivores can't eat unclean chunks since it'll be MUCH more useful after such a change regardless.
User avatar

Shoals Surfer

Posts: 301

Joined: Saturday, 21st May 2011, 08:23

Post Monday, 3rd September 2012, 07:24

Re: Contaminated Chunks

How about removing nausea and making it so that:

if you eat a chunk you get x nutrition

Contaminated chunk is x/2 nutrition except for carnivore 1 , who gets full nutrition from contam but cannot get "full" from chunks.

Carnivore 2 lets them get "full" from chunks.

This would be a lot simpler.
(p.s. this is stupid some dev please make it not stupid) - minmay
User avatar

Tomb Titivator

Posts: 857

Joined: Monday, 31st January 2011, 23:19

Post Monday, 3rd September 2012, 17:22

Re: Contaminated Chunks

minmay wrote:What if those mutations just had one level each? Herbivore 1 does basically nothing right now.

KoboldLord wrote:Gourmand or carnivore 1 basically triples your safe margin.

...and still upholds the tradition of every amulet except faith being near-worthless for anything except sheer convenience. Better to remove it than nerf it if you think its effect is bad, since it already sucks.

So... centaur would lose herbivore? That sounds fine honestly.
User avatar

Shoals Surfer

Posts: 301

Joined: Saturday, 21st May 2011, 08:23

Post Monday, 3rd September 2012, 18:55

Re: Contaminated Chunks

Eat a contaminated chunk:

"Eww, that didn't taste good, you spit most of it out!"

Lose the chunk, gain some fraction of a chunk's worth of nutrition.

carnivore mutation removes or ameliorates this effect.
(p.s. this is stupid some dev please make it not stupid) - minmay
User avatar

Dungeon Master

Posts: 4031

Joined: Thursday, 16th December 2010, 20:37

Location: France

Post Tuesday, 4th September 2012, 11:18

Re: Contaminated Chunks

I sent this to c-r-d and here is elliptic's answer:

I don't think anything that reduces early-game food by this much is a good idea... we don't actually want players to starve! Also, doing this would remove any interest in the matter... just some chars would have more chunks than others. I'd prefer to just remove the contaminated/clean distinction period if we don't like nausea. (Personally I think nausea is reasonably interesting though.)
<+Grunt> You dereference an invalid pointer! Ouch! That really hurt! The game dies...

Abyss Ambulator

Posts: 1131

Joined: Tuesday, 4th January 2011, 15:03

Post Tuesday, 4th September 2012, 12:09

Re: Contaminated Chunks

Well, if you fear that early players will starve, give them two rations instead of one. Or generate more rats. I rarely eat brown chunks in the early game (with non trolls-ghouls-kobolds), and I have only starved with spriggans. I do not think this matters, really.

Early game is short, but nausea will bother you troughout the game.

Removing the distinction is also good, tough it will make food even more abundant than now. I tought that a little (not too much) tightening of the food clock was planned.
User avatar

Tomb Titivator

Posts: 857

Joined: Monday, 31st January 2011, 23:19

Post Tuesday, 4th September 2012, 13:16

Re: Contaminated Chunks

Is early game starvation really an issue? An extra ration could fix that. Also in what ways is nausea interesting? That's the part I don't understand the most. I always thought it was just a way to tighten the food clock.

Slime Squisher

Posts: 375

Joined: Sunday, 15th January 2012, 16:59

Post Tuesday, 4th September 2012, 13:44

Re: Contaminated Chunks

Realistically, early game is the only time you will be without 5 or 10 extra ration for most characters. If you cast a bunch of ## and #### hunger spells and get really unlucky with corpses, and lose access to the guaranteed ration somhow, I can see a character starving. This is basically the only wy I can think of, though.

Ziggurat Zagger

Posts: 3163

Joined: Friday, 6th January 2012, 18:45

Post Tuesday, 4th September 2012, 14:41

Re: Contaminated Chunks

I liked the change from sickness to nausea. Prior to that, I never ate contaminated chunks unless I was starving. The change came along with the removal of the Hive, which took a lot of food out of the dungeon. Since food still isn't really an issue, maybe tightening the clock more by removing contaminated chunks from all but carnivores is a good idea. That or making contaminated chunks a hard choice by reintroducing sickness.

Return to Game Design Discussion

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 37 guests

cron
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group.
Designed by ST Software for PTF.