Throwing Brand Removals thread


Although the central place for design discussion is ##crawl-dev on freenode, some may find it helpful to discuss requests and suggestions here first.

Tartarus Sorceror

Posts: 1739

Joined: Tuesday, 13th March 2012, 02:48

Post Monday, 7th August 2017, 23:54

Throwing Brand Removals thread

Currently the player can get 22 stacks of throwables and needles. (Not counting the offbrand ammo store). This is far too many, because it hogs so much inventory. The reason there haven't been more complains is because throwing is both OP and super annoying to use, so everyone prefers not to talk about it.

  Code:
case MI_NEEDLE:
        // Curare is special cased, all the others aren't.
        if (got_curare_roll(item_level))
        {
            rc = SPMSL_CURARE;
            break;
        }

        rc = random_choose_weighted(30, SPMSL_SLEEP,
                                    30, SPMSL_CONFUSION,
                                    10, SPMSL_PARALYSIS,
                                    10, SPMSL_FRENZY,
                                    nw, SPMSL_POISONED);
        break;
    case MI_JAVELIN:
        rc = random_choose_weighted(30, SPMSL_RETURNING,
                                    32, SPMSL_PENETRATION,
                                    32, SPMSL_POISONED,
                                    21, SPMSL_STEEL,
                                    20, SPMSL_SILVER,
                                    nw, SPMSL_NORMAL);
        break;
    case MI_TOMAHAWK:
        rc = random_choose_weighted(15, SPMSL_POISONED,
                                    10, SPMSL_SILVER,
                                    10, SPMSL_STEEL,
                                    12, SPMSL_DISPERSAL,
                                    28, SPMSL_RETURNING,
                                    15, SPMSL_EXPLODING,
                                    nw, SPMSL_NORMAL);
break;


My suggestions for removal:
1. Needle of confusion = bad wand of confusion.
2. Needle of paralysis = bad wand of paralysis.
3. Needle of sleep. Generally super ineffective, because the monster wakes up again right away. And we have a spell for it already.
*** Once removed as standalone brands, sleep and paralysis effects could be rolled into the curare brand, with the exact effect (slow, sleep, paralysis, strong poison) per shot varying by RNG and monster toughness.
4&5. Returning brand. This is super super boring, on both monsters and for the player. It could remain as a special case for the kobolds in that one bailey.
6&7. Poison on javelins and tomahawks. Steps on needles.
8. Steel brand tomahawk. Just use a javelin. If you're too small to use javelins, too bad.
9&10. Silver brand. This is relevant against 2% of monsters, but the only ones worth the inventory slot comes at the very end of the game.

Spoiler: show
inb4 suggestions to remove throwing entirely

For this message the author Rast has received thanks: 8
Airwolf, Blomdor, Doesnt, emikaela, Gigaslurp, sdynet, Styro, VeryAngryFelid
User avatar

Tartarus Sorceror

Posts: 1698

Joined: Saturday, 18th June 2016, 13:57

Post Tuesday, 8th August 2017, 00:07

Re: Throwing Brand Removals thread

Silver brand seems to me a good ability to give to Zin. You activate it and, while it's active, all weapons (ranged and melee) you use are silver-branded.
I Feel the Need--the Need for Beer
Spoiler: show
3DSBeTr 15DSFiRu 3DSMoNe 3FoHuGo 3TrArOk 3HOFEVe 3MfGlOk 4GrEEVe 3BaIEChei 3HuMoOka 3MiWnQaz 3VSFiAsh 3DrTmMakh 3DSCKXom 3OgMoOka 3NaFiOka 3FoFiOka 3MuFEVeh 3CeHuOka 3TrMoTSO 3DEFESif 3DSMoOka 3DSFiOka

Abyss Ambulator

Posts: 1193

Joined: Friday, 16th January 2015, 20:20

Post Tuesday, 8th August 2017, 00:27

Re: Throwing Brand Removals thread

Returning is very convenient to use, though...

For this message the author Airwolf has received thanks: 4
Majang, petercordia, shmup, Styro

Ziggurat Zagger

Posts: 3037

Joined: Sunday, 2nd January 2011, 02:06

Post Tuesday, 8th August 2017, 01:17

Re: Throwing Brand Removals thread

Instead of returning existing, it would be better if all ammo mulched on every shot, and monsters had infinite ammo that doesn't affect the amount of ammo they were going to drop.

For this message the author KoboldLord has received thanks: 9
acoolguy, Airwolf, Blomdor, duvessa, Ge0ff, Gigaslurp, ichbins, nago, Terrapin
User avatar

Zot Zealot

Posts: 982

Joined: Monday, 29th September 2014, 09:04

Post Tuesday, 8th August 2017, 01:32

Re: Throwing Brand Removals thread

I agree with most of this.

1. Needle of confusion = bad wand of confusion.
2. Needle of paralysis = bad wand of paralysis.

Suggestion: leave one as only a needle, and the other as only a wand.

6&7. Poison on javelins and tomahawks. Steps on needles.
The different base damage makes them pretty different for higher throwing skill players. But perhaps poison tomahawks could be removed to improve the differentiation between poisoned needles/javelins.
User avatar

Zot Zealot

Posts: 982

Joined: Monday, 29th September 2014, 09:04

Post Tuesday, 8th August 2017, 02:48

Re: Throwing Brand Removals thread

I opened a PR that implements some of these suggestions https://github.com/crawl/crawl/pull/587

For this message the author chequers has received thanks: 6
Airwolf, Blomdor, emikaela, Gigaslurp, Rast, VeryAngryFelid

Slime Squisher

Posts: 352

Joined: Monday, 14th December 2015, 00:43

Post Tuesday, 8th August 2017, 04:09

Re: Throwing Brand Removals thread

Fighting limited inventory slots and inventory management in general by removing items doesn't sound like the best idea to me, though it's certainly an easy way out.

Tartarus Sorceror

Posts: 1739

Joined: Tuesday, 13th March 2012, 02:48

Post Tuesday, 8th August 2017, 05:08

Re: Throwing Brand Removals thread

Leszczynek wrote:Fighting limited inventory slots and inventory management in general by removing items doesn't sound like the best idea to me, though it's certainly an easy way out.


It worked for wands. And the differences between the various thrown brands (exceptions: dispersal and piercing) are less than the differences between the various removed attack wands.

Slime Squisher

Posts: 374

Joined: Saturday, 29th March 2014, 20:53

Post Tuesday, 8th August 2017, 16:20

Re: Throwing Brand Removals thread

Inventory clutter is a persistent issue in Crawl and I'm generally supportive of measures to reduce it. Playing anything but pure melee gets on my nerves because of it. Don't make a special exception for the kobolds in *that bailey* though; hammering through the messages every time they spam their tomahawks for little or no damage is really annoying, and it's the least interesting bailey layout anyway IMO. I wouldn't mind if I never saw it again.

Tartarus Sorceror

Posts: 1739

Joined: Tuesday, 13th March 2012, 02:48

Post Friday, 31st August 2018, 21:50

Re: Throwing Brand Removals thread

Bumping this since it's been a year.

I suspect the reason nothing has changed is that dev team has plans for a Grand Ranged Combat Overhaul, and in the meantime nobody wants to make a short-term quality of life improvement. Well, speaking as a player, I'll take the a QOL improvement now over a balance change sometime in the unknown future.

Here's the relevant section of makeitem.cc: https://github.com/crawl/crawl/blob/552 ... em.cc#L532

Here are my suggested changes:

  Code:
    case MI_NEEDLE:
        // Curare is special cased, all the others aren't.
        if (got_curare_roll(item_level))
        {
            rc = SPMSL_CURARE;
            break;
        }

        rc = random_choose_weighted(20, SPMSL_FRENZY,
                                    nw, SPMSL_POISONED);
        break;
    case MI_JAVELIN:
        rc = random_choose_weighted(35, SPMSL_PENETRATION,
                                    25, SPMSL_STEEL,
                                    nw, SPMSL_NORMAL);
        break;
    case MI_TOMAHAWK:
        rc = random_choose_weighted(15, SPMSL_DISPERSAL,
                                    30, SPMSL_RETURNING,
                                    20, SPMSL_EXPLODING,
                                    nw, SPMSL_NORMAL);
break;


I slightly increased the weights of the kept brands to make up for the removed ones, but feel free to bikeshed those numbers. The important thing is reducing inventory stacks.

Ziggurat Zagger

Posts: 8786

Joined: Sunday, 5th May 2013, 08:25

Post Friday, 31st August 2018, 22:27

Re: Throwing Brand Removals thread

My suggestion is to just remove all the remaining ammo brands, including needles and blowguns.

Slime Squisher

Posts: 344

Joined: Tuesday, 14th April 2015, 19:56

Location: France

Post Friday, 31st August 2018, 22:40

Re: Throwing Brand Removals thread

duvessa wrote:My suggestion is to just remove all the remaining ammo brands, including needles and blowguns.

Just keep curare for Sonja and kobold packs, those are F U N
3 runes : MiMo^Ru, HOFi^Beogh, TrMo^Yredelemnul, GrFi^Ru, FoFi^Gozag, MiGl^Okawaru
4 runes : DDFi^Makhleb
5 runes : GrEE^Vehumet
15 runes : MiFi^Ru, NaWz^Sif Muna, GrWz^Sif Muna
I mostly play offline or online on CXC

For this message the author Fingolfin has received thanks:
duvessa

Ziggurat Zagger

Posts: 8786

Joined: Sunday, 5th May 2013, 08:25

Post Friday, 31st August 2018, 22:43

Re: Throwing Brand Removals thread

Make Snakebite a crossbow and generate Sonja with it

For this message the author duvessa has received thanks:
Airwolf

Shoals Surfer

Posts: 276

Joined: Sunday, 6th November 2016, 19:19

Post Saturday, 1st September 2018, 00:32

Re: Throwing Brand Removals thread

This thread is a year old, but I have to say that characterising confusion & paralysis needles as 'bad wands' is pretty uncharitable.

There's plenty of monsters with high MR (and lowish HD) that can be confused/paralysed with a needle, like high-level elves for example, but not with a wand.

Do the needle brands deserve to be in the game? I don't particularly care, but they're alot better than their wand counterparts in certain situations.
16/26 on the way to GreaterOctopode (Win all backgrounds as an Octopode)

Progress so far : OpFi, OpGl, OpWn, OpAr, OpCK, OpMo, OpBe, OpHu, OpVM, OpAM, OpWr, OpFE, OpEE, OpNe, OpTm, OpSk

For this message the author Vajrapani has received thanks: 3
Airwolf, petercordia, TheMeInTeam

Abyss Ambulator

Posts: 1193

Joined: Friday, 16th January 2015, 20:20

Post Saturday, 1st September 2018, 05:02

Re: Throwing Brand Removals thread

There's plenty of monsters with infinite MR that can be confused/paralysed with a needle, like fucking Panlords for example, but not with a wand.

Tartarus Sorceror

Posts: 1739

Joined: Tuesday, 13th March 2012, 02:48

Post Saturday, 1st September 2018, 19:18

Re: Throwing Brand Removals thread

I don't really want to get into the discussion of how dumb it is for confusion from spells to respect MR and confusion from needle to ignore MR.

So how about this:

  Code:
40, SPMSL_FRENZY,


There, now confusion needles have been exactly replaced with frenzy.

Ziggurat Zagger

Posts: 4432

Joined: Friday, 8th May 2015, 17:51

Post Saturday, 1st September 2018, 21:13

Re: Throwing Brand Removals thread

Everything that checks HD should be removed. Why? Because I don't want to explore with blowgun with needles of paralysis and compare success chance for wand of paralysis (MR check) and success chance for needles of paralysis (HD check) for every monster. Currently success chance is not even displayed for needles and mephitic cloud which makes it even worse because I need spoilers and calculation to compare them..
Underestimated: cleaving, Deep Elf, Formicid, Vehumet, EV
Overestimated: AC, GDS
Twin account of Sandman25

For this message the author VeryAngryFelid has received thanks: 4
Airwolf, duvessa, nago, Styro
User avatar

Ziggurat Zagger

Posts: 4478

Joined: Wednesday, 23rd October 2013, 07:56

Post Saturday, 1st September 2018, 22:16

Re: Throwing Brand Removals thread

Just display the success chance for HD dependent effects. Also remove either needles or wands of paralysis.
DCSS: 97:...MfCj}SpNeBaEEGrFE{HaAKTrCK}DsFESpHu{FoArNaBe}
FeEE{HOIEMiAE}GrGlHuWrGnWrNaAKBaFi{MiDeMfDe}{DrAKTrAMGhEnGnWz}
{PaBeDjFi}OgAKPaCAGnCjOgCKMfAEAtCKSpCjDEEE{HOSu
Bloat: 17: RaRoPrPh{GuStGnCa}{ArEtZoNb}KiPaAnDrBXDBQOApDaMeAGBiOCNKAsFnFlUs{RoBoNeWi

Swamp Slogger

Posts: 139

Joined: Friday, 13th March 2015, 13:33

Post Sunday, 2nd September 2018, 08:54

Re: Throwing Brand Removals thread

Get rid of all brands from thrown. Get rid of blowgun and all needles except poison and curare and turn those into darts. All ammo mulches and you get bigger stacks to compensate. Stick to snake uses more arrows.

Tartarus Sorceror

Posts: 1739

Joined: Tuesday, 13th March 2012, 02:48

Post Friday, 12th April 2019, 16:39

Re: Throwing Brand Removals thread

Bumping this again. Each time I look at the list of ammo brands, the number that I think are worth keeping gets smaller.

  Code:
    case MI_NEEDLE:
        // Curare is special cased, all the others aren't.
        if (got_curare_roll(item_level))
            rc = SPMSL_CURARE;
            else rc = SPMSL_POISONED;
        break;
    case MI_JAVELIN:
        rc = random_choose_weighted(50, SPMSL_PENETRATION,
                                    nw, SPMSL_NORMAL);
        break;
    case MI_TOMAHAWK:
        rc = random_choose_weighted(30, SPMSL_DISPERSAL,
                                    nw, SPMSL_NORMAL);
break;

Returning would still show up in that one bailey, and of course the off-brand ammo shop would stick around as a fun joke.

But I get the impression that, unfortunately, there's no desire on the dev team to remove ammo brands except as part of another grand ranged combat reform.

For this message the author Rast has received thanks:
Airwolf

Halls Hopper

Posts: 81

Joined: Monday, 18th March 2019, 22:11

Post Saturday, 13th April 2019, 04:01

Re: Throwing Brand Removals thread

If brands aren't removed, I would at least like if throwing items were goldified.

For this message the author acoolguy has received thanks:
petercordia

Spider Stomper

Posts: 200

Joined: Sunday, 11th May 2014, 11:26

Post Saturday, 13th April 2019, 08:23

Re: Throwing Brand Removals thread

KoboldLord wrote:Instead of returning existing, it would be better if all ammo mulched on every shot, and monsters had infinite ammo that doesn't affect the amount of ammo they were going to drop.

That means the rock giant throws the rock endlessly.


Rast wrote:Bumping this again. Each time I look at the list of ammo brands, the number that I think are worth keeping gets smaller.

  Code:
    case MI_JAVELIN:
        rc = random_choose_weighted(50, SPMSL_PENETRATION,
                                    nw, SPMSL_NORMAL);
        break;
    case MI_TOMAHAWK:
        rc = random_choose_weighted(30, SPMSL_DISPERSAL,
                                    nw, SPMSL_NORMAL);
break;

Returning would still show up in that one bailey, and of course the off-brand ammo shop would stick around as a fun joke.

But I get the impression that, unfortunately, there's no desire on the dev team to remove ammo brands except as part of another grand ranged combat reform.


While more careful discussion on needle changes will be needed, reducing the brand of javelin and tomahawk seems to be an immediate option. It is also a very simple work.

Zot Zealot

Posts: 1004

Joined: Thursday, 16th August 2018, 21:19

Post Saturday, 13th April 2019, 13:21

Re: Throwing Brand Removals thread

Could it be possible to put ammo in a separate inventory, similar to the spell library? You could access it with Q :)

Ziggurat Zagger

Posts: 8786

Joined: Sunday, 5th May 2013, 08:25

Post Saturday, 13th April 2019, 17:49

Re: Throwing Brand Removals thread

sdynet wrote:
KoboldLord wrote:Instead of returning existing, it would be better if all ammo mulched on every shot, and monsters had infinite ammo that doesn't affect the amount of ammo they were going to drop.

That means the rock giant throws the rock endlessly.
That would be an improvement.
User avatar

Tartarus Sorceror

Posts: 1698

Joined: Saturday, 18th June 2016, 13:57

Post Saturday, 13th April 2019, 19:46

Re: Throwing Brand Removals thread

Wait, they don't? I assumed monsters had infinite ammo.
I Feel the Need--the Need for Beer
Spoiler: show
3DSBeTr 15DSFiRu 3DSMoNe 3FoHuGo 3TrArOk 3HOFEVe 3MfGlOk 4GrEEVe 3BaIEChei 3HuMoOka 3MiWnQaz 3VSFiAsh 3DrTmMakh 3DSCKXom 3OgMoOka 3NaFiOka 3FoFiOka 3MuFEVeh 3CeHuOka 3TrMoTSO 3DEFESif 3DSMoOka 3DSFiOka

Zot Zealot

Posts: 1004

Joined: Thursday, 16th August 2018, 21:19

Post Saturday, 13th April 2019, 20:41

Re: Throwing Brand Removals thread

Yes, stone giants (and some other monsters) typically only have 3 big rocks. Also, they don't pick them up again after they've thrown them. So if you can't afford to take 2 consecutive rocks to the face, its a good trick to go back upstairs after a rock connects and heal up, and the monster will stop throwing rocks after you've done this often enough.
If you have good AC/EV/SH, you can stand still in LOS, wait for the stone giant to run out of rocks, and fight him at the location of your choosing.
I like this monster behaviour.

For this message the author petercordia has received thanks:
Rast
User avatar

Tartarus Sorceror

Posts: 1698

Joined: Saturday, 18th June 2016, 13:57

Post Saturday, 13th April 2019, 23:06

Re: Throwing Brand Removals thread

I'd like it if the monsters had a maximum missiles that can be looted, but had infinite missiles to throw (auto-mulch over the loot limit).
I Feel the Need--the Need for Beer
Spoiler: show
3DSBeTr 15DSFiRu 3DSMoNe 3FoHuGo 3TrArOk 3HOFEVe 3MfGlOk 4GrEEVe 3BaIEChei 3HuMoOka 3MiWnQaz 3VSFiAsh 3DrTmMakh 3DSCKXom 3OgMoOka 3NaFiOka 3FoFiOka 3MuFEVeh 3CeHuOka 3TrMoTSO 3DEFESif 3DSMoOka 3DSFiOka

Spider Stomper

Posts: 200

Joined: Sunday, 11th May 2014, 11:26

Post Sunday, 14th April 2019, 04:57

Re: Throwing Brand Removals thread

duvessa wrote:
sdynet wrote:
KoboldLord wrote:Instead of returning existing, it would be better if all ammo mulched on every shot, and monsters had infinite ammo that doesn't affect the amount of ammo they were going to drop.

That means the rock giant throws the rock endlessly.
That would be an improvement.

This is essentially the same as Iron Shot, which has no range limits and cannot be prevented by anti magic or silence. So far, this power has been tolerated because of a quantity limitation. So, if this restriction is even lifted, what should they pay for?

Ziggurat Zagger

Posts: 8786

Joined: Sunday, 5th May 2013, 08:25

Post Sunday, 14th April 2019, 10:03

Re: Throwing Brand Removals thread

It's actually fine to make monsters more dangerous.

Cocytus Succeeder

Posts: 2229

Joined: Sunday, 18th December 2011, 13:31

Post Sunday, 14th April 2019, 11:08

Re: Throwing Brand Removals thread

I'd say:

1) if a char can afford to let a stone giant to run out of his rocks, there aren't big difference if he has unlimited rock. If a char can't afford to face a rock, it doesn't matter if it is one or unlimited.

2) abusing limited rock supply of stone giant and especially cyclops (slow speed yuppi doh) to make them not dangerous at distance is bad design

3) I do not think buffing stone giant is good because of power spiral problems, but dcss already suffer heavily of that and stone giant are probably far less threating than anything else in depths nowadays and of most thing in vault too
Last edited by nago on Sunday, 14th April 2019, 21:34, edited 1 time in total.
screw it I hate this character I'm gonna go melee Gastronok

For this message the author nago has received thanks:
duvessa

Zot Zealot

Posts: 1004

Joined: Thursday, 16th August 2018, 21:19

Post Sunday, 14th April 2019, 21:02

Re: Throwing Brand Removals thread

nago wrote:I'd say:
1) if a char can afford to let a stone giant to run out of his rocks, there aren't big difference if he has unlimited rock. If a char can't afford to face a rock, it doesn't matter if it is one or unlimited.

From my experience, I disagree ;)

For this message the author petercordia has received thanks: 2
Rast, TheMeInTeam

Cocytus Succeeder

Posts: 2229

Joined: Sunday, 18th December 2011, 13:31

Post Sunday, 14th April 2019, 21:34

Re: Throwing Brand Removals thread

Why?
screw it I hate this character I'm gonna go melee Gastronok

Zot Zealot

Posts: 1004

Joined: Thursday, 16th August 2018, 21:19

Post Sunday, 14th April 2019, 21:53

Re: Throwing Brand Removals thread

Some examples of characters who abused rocks running out:
A felid, who could be 2-shotted
A octopode, who could be 2-shotted
A hybrid barachi summoner, with only the starting summoning book, who found a rock giant on Orc:1. He needed many (~7) tries to kill the stone giant, which meant he had to escape often. If the stone giant hadn't run out of rocks, he wouldn't have been able to escape safely, and hence wouldn't have been able to engage safely.
A underleveled character in depths, who had to run away from fights fairly often, and really appreciated the way some fights got easier after a while.

The general theme is that running away is a lot easier/safer when you become out-of-range when you step away one extra tile. Some characters need to be close to do damage, so they can't damage a creature with a full-LOS attack in a way which allows them to retreat safely. They can safely tank a limited number of such attacks, and they can safely manage a hard-hitting melee creature. Hence they can manage a rock giant by baiting it to throw all its rocks.

Blades Runner

Posts: 593

Joined: Tuesday, 11th December 2018, 19:14

Post Monday, 15th April 2019, 16:05

Re: Throwing Brand Removals thread

nago wrote:I'd say:

1) if a char can afford to let a stone giant to run out of his rocks, there aren't big difference if he has unlimited rock. If a char can't afford to face a rock, it doesn't matter if it is one or unlimited.

2) abusing limited rock supply of stone giant and especially cyclops (slow speed yuppi doh) to make them not dangerous at distance is bad design

3) I do not think buffing stone giant is good because of power spiral problems, but dcss already suffer heavily of that and stone giant are probably far less threating than anything else in depths nowadays and of most thing in vault too


You can do this with more monsters than just giants/cyclops. It's a thankless way to handle something like Vashnia + 4 sharpshooters, but you CAN.

I rather dislike ranged enemies camping stairs. It's too prone to stalemate scenarios/annoyance where you just go down repeatedly until they finally miss enough that you can do something safely, then go back up. I do not consider a scenario where their ammunition is infinite to be an improvement to design in this context.

In other words, yes it does matter whether the ammo is infinite or not.

Also while the game already has inconsistency between player and monster options (spells costing mana and a few other effects) having monsters but not players access infinite ammo is another non-intuitive inconsistency that I don't see adds enough to the game to merit going that route. It's already odd that literally identical (in terms of name/appearance) spells can be so much stronger (fireball) or weaker (poison arrow) on monsters, even to the point that a servitor mirroring player's own fireball is better than its master with that and only that spell most times.
Last edited by TheMeInTeam on Tuesday, 16th April 2019, 14:26, edited 1 time in total.

For this message the author TheMeInTeam has received thanks: 2
petercordia, Rast

Crypt Cleanser

Posts: 689

Joined: Saturday, 12th December 2015, 23:54

Post Monday, 15th April 2019, 22:33

Re: Throwing Brand Removals thread

TheMeInTeam wrote:You can do this with more monsters than just giants/cyclops. It's a thankless way to handle something like Vashnia + 4 sharpshooters, but you CAN.

I rather dislike ranged enemies camping stairs. It's too prone to stalemate scenarios/annoyance where you just go down repeatedly until they finally miss enough that you can do something safely, then go back up. I do not consider a scenario where their ammunition is infinite to be an improvement to design in this context.

That you can theoretically go down a staircase twenty or more times to run Vashnia's band out of bolts suggests a major design problem with the player's ability to repeatedly disengage from fights. The problem here lies in the going down repeatedly and should be tackled from that angle. Extended stairdancing of this type certainly shouldn't be rewarded by eventually trivializing the fight.

There are various ways to tackle player/monster consistency if there's the will to implement them. Whether that means removing player ammunition limits as well, automulch with sufficiently large stacks of ammo such that running monsters out of ammunition is infeasible, spell-ifying relevant ammunition-using monster attacks, or some other option, I think inconsistency problems are surmountable.

For this message the author Hellmonk has received thanks: 3
duvessa, Implojin, nago

Zot Zealot

Posts: 1004

Joined: Thursday, 16th August 2018, 21:19

Post Tuesday, 16th April 2019, 01:04

Re: Throwing Brand Removals thread

Actually, repeatedly stairdancing a mob of ranged units is a good way to get killed. Eventually they're all going to hit you, and in Snake you can get constricted on the stair. If you're forced to stoop to trying to make Vashnia run out of arrows, I think this is punishment enough.

Blades Runner

Posts: 593

Joined: Tuesday, 11th December 2018, 19:14

Post Tuesday, 16th April 2019, 14:32

Re: Throwing Brand Removals thread

petercordia wrote:Actually, repeatedly stairdancing a mob of ranged units is a good way to get killed. Eventually they're all going to hit you, and in Snake you can get constricted on the stair. If you're forced to stoop to trying to make Vashnia run out of arrows, I think this is punishment enough.


Agreed, "stairdancing" is not always free. There are some situations where attempting it is a direct cause of player death, and others where it is relatively safe. For example you can tank the rounds of arrows multiple times with high enough odds and have cleared a good chunk of the level --> can blink and walk to other stairs if really unlucky. However as you say, going down stairs into ranged with an enemy that can constrict you, paralyze you, remove the stairs, or remove your character from the stairs will cost resources to escape at best and end the run at worst. Frail species are especially vulnerable and can sometimes die w/o a turn to stuff that wasn't even visible when they went up the stairs.

In many cases the same thing could be accomplished vs Vashnia (who is relatively slow) by simply maintaining near edge of LoS and tanking arrows, then walking away. I'm not convinced crawl would be better with more areas playing like tomb.

For this message the author TheMeInTeam has received thanks:
petercordia

Spider Stomper

Posts: 200

Joined: Sunday, 11th May 2014, 11:26

Post Tuesday, 23rd April 2019, 15:24

Re: Throwing Brand Removals thread

I opened a PR: https://github.com/crawl/crawl/pull/1048
Remove throwables ammo brands(poison, steel).

For this message the author sdynet has received thanks: 2
IveGoneSupine, stormdragon

Dungeon Master

Posts: 250

Joined: Thursday, 27th November 2014, 19:12

Post Thursday, 9th May 2019, 06:47

Re: Throwing Brand Removals thread

sdynet's PR has been incorporated into this branch: https://github.com/crawl/crawl/pull/1062 which I plan to merge soon (pending todo completion).

It's less severe in removals and I make no attempt to solve the Big Crawl Problems of Ranged Combat and also Stairs and Food Too, but it reduces the number of throwables from 20 to 12, and removes blowguns. Of those 12 three are large rock, stone, and throwing net, which are respectively mostly unusable, useless, and very rare. For a normal sized species that throws, gets rad drops, and doesn't insist on carrying stones, this frees up 10 inventory slots (from 19 throwables plus blowgun to 9 throwables, no blowgun).

Some fun facts in this project:

  • Throwing was left out of the last big ranged brand consolidation. The last serious time throwing items and brands were looked at was 0.6!
  • You could use a blowgun while netted but not throw anything else nor use other launchers. Now you just can't throw stuff while netted.
  • Re-using the Jester SPMSL_BLINDING type led to a bug that took a really long time to hunt down, but as a bonus any save compatibility Jesters get a rare atropa branded tomahawk if they still had their pies around.

For this message the author ebering has received thanks: 7
chequers, duvessa, nago, Rast, sdynet, Shtopit, stormdragon

Cocytus Succeeder

Posts: 2229

Joined: Sunday, 18th December 2011, 13:31

Post Thursday, 9th May 2019, 08:19

Re: Throwing Brand Removals thread

On one hand I'll miss the returning brand - the bailey with kobolds and returning tomahawk was alone enough to train some throwing for char even without Oka and Trog. On the other hand throwing has so many problems that anything improves remotely it it's a huge progress. Kudos for your work!
screw it I hate this character I'm gonna go melee Gastronok

Spider Stomper

Posts: 200

Joined: Sunday, 11th May 2014, 11:26

Post Thursday, 9th May 2019, 11:35

Re: Throwing Brand Removals thread

I am always grateful for the ardor and commitment of the dev team. Kudos for your work!

Zot Zealot

Posts: 1004

Joined: Thursday, 16th August 2018, 21:19

Post Thursday, 9th May 2019, 12:11

Re: Throwing Brand Removals thread

Is this a nerf for needle-stabbers?
User avatar

Dis Charger

Posts: 1949

Joined: Monday, 18th February 2013, 07:59

Location: France

Post Thursday, 9th May 2019, 14:06

Re: Throwing Brand Removals thread

petercordia wrote:Is this a nerf the end for needle-stabbers?
FTFY
Online stats
Fastest Hell runes (enter Hell branch -> get the rune)
Icy : 56 / Iron : 126 / Obsidian : 215 / Bone : 125

For this message the author mopl has received thanks:
nago

Spider Stomper

Posts: 200

Joined: Sunday, 11th May 2014, 11:26

Post Thursday, 9th May 2019, 15:24

Re: Throwing Brand Removals thread

petercordia wrote:Is this a nerf for needle-stabbers?


Basically, yes. But there are one positive aspects that we'll see in. We don't need to switch weapons anymore. You don't have to switching them three times to stab the three enemies.

For this message the author sdynet has received thanks:
nago

Blades Runner

Posts: 593

Joined: Tuesday, 11th December 2018, 19:14

Post Thursday, 9th May 2019, 15:58

Re: Throwing Brand Removals thread

petercordia wrote:Is this a nerf for needle-stabbers?


Unsure. Saving actions in switching is an advantage, having sleep be a chance over confusion/paralysis might or might not make things worse. It's a powerful stab, but they wake up so easily so it depends how close.

I'm going to miss nets (relevant to stabbing and have a lot of powerful use cases) and stones (inexpensive item to throw to aggro with minimal noise, though the monster will still make noise). I don't want to mulch comparatively rare tomahawks/etc just to aggro something, and while you can technically throw anything to get a monster's attention it's less convenient.

I don't see how stones are "useless" either, since they serve not only as a poor throwing tool/aggro inducer but also as ammunition for slings against popcorn. Sling bullets are relatively rare and if they're considered too strong for early game this wouldn't be my pick for nerfing them.
User avatar

Dis Charger

Posts: 1949

Joined: Monday, 18th February 2013, 07:59

Location: France

Post Thursday, 9th May 2019, 16:59

Re: Throwing Brand Removals thread

Needle stab was my 90% of the time tech for late uniques, especially pan and hell lords (with drowning Cerebov being the funniest of all)... RIP
Online stats
Fastest Hell runes (enter Hell branch -> get the rune)
Icy : 56 / Iron : 126 / Obsidian : 215 / Bone : 125

Ziggurat Zagger

Posts: 6454

Joined: Tuesday, 30th October 2012, 19:06

Post Friday, 10th May 2019, 01:14

Re: Throwing Brand Removals thread

No penetration javelins either...
Spoiler: show
This high quality signature has been hidden for your protection. To unlock it's secret, send 3 easy payments of $9.99 to me, by way of your nearest theta band or ley line. Complete your transmission by midnight tonight for a special free gift!

Spider Stomper

Posts: 200

Joined: Sunday, 11th May 2014, 11:26

Post Friday, 10th May 2019, 04:16

Re: Throwing Brand Removals thread

No.
ebering wrote:To differentiate the different types of throwables, javelins now always penetrate. This overlaps some with crossbows, which provide a penetrating brand, but a crossbow user can choose from many brands and has access to weapon enchantment.

Ziggurat Zagger

Posts: 6454

Joined: Tuesday, 30th October 2012, 19:06

Post Friday, 10th May 2019, 04:22

Re: Throwing Brand Removals thread

Ah, I just read the original proposal and this thread, I didn't dig deep enough :)
Spoiler: show
This high quality signature has been hidden for your protection. To unlock it's secret, send 3 easy payments of $9.99 to me, by way of your nearest theta band or ley line. Complete your transmission by midnight tonight for a special free gift!

Spider Stomper

Posts: 200

Joined: Sunday, 11th May 2014, 11:26

Post Friday, 10th May 2019, 06:29

Re: Throwing Brand Removals thread

I have a small proposal to improve QoL of the boomerang(new name of tomahawk). What do you think about the 0% chance that the boomerang will not return when the skill level is high enough?
According to Wiki, the chance of not returning is 'At 3 or more skill, (1/(4 + skill))%'. In this case, the chance is 3.22% when the skill is 27.
I propose to add the following conditions to this: If chance of not returning is less than 4%, the chance is 0%.
The now chance is exactly 4.0% when the skill level is 21. Therefore, if this condition is applied, the chance is 0% after skill level 22.
When the skill level is above 22, the player will be able to escape the hassle of picking up the boomerang he threw again. Wouldn't it be okay for a player with a skill level of 22 to enjoy that level of comfort?
Next

Return to Game Design Discussion

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 23 guests

Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group.
Designed by ST Software for PTF.