Rods should fall into 'Staves' category


Although the central place for design discussion is ##crawl-dev on freenode, some may find it helpful to discuss requests and suggestions here first.

User avatar

Spider Stomper

Posts: 246

Joined: Thursday, 19th July 2012, 11:07

Post Monday, 29th June 2015, 18:31

Rods should fall into 'Staves' category

Right now all kinds of rods fall into 'maces & flails' category (at least it says so in description).
Which is pretty strange to me.
It's half way between wand and staff (no way close to mace/flail).
It definitely looks like staff on a tile.
Scroll of aquirement thinks it's a staff (at least it gives me rods when I ask for staves).
It shoots freaking magic (what mace shoots magic?..)
I can only assume it's some kind of mistake that they end up with maces and I suggest to move them to staves.

For this message the author white_noise has received thanks:
Sandman25

Vestibule Violator

Posts: 1601

Joined: Sunday, 14th July 2013, 16:36

Post Monday, 29th June 2015, 18:49

Re: Rods should fall into 'Staves' category

white_noise wrote:(what mace shoots magic?..)

Devastator. Firestarter. Sceptre of Torment.

Rods. ;)

I think the intent was that you're supposed to envision their use in melee as being more like a makeshift club.

Dungeon Master

Posts: 634

Joined: Sunday, 22nd September 2013, 14:46

Post Tuesday, 30th June 2015, 13:34

Re: Rods should fall into 'Staves' category

Rods should probably just not be melee weapons (and then be acquired in the misc category instead).

The only effect this would have that I can think of is that you couldn't use them and have your hand bound on an Ash worshipper. I doubt anyone uses rod melee seriously.

For this message the author wheals has received thanks: 3
Sandman25, Sar, Sprucery
User avatar

Ziggurat Zagger

Posts: 4478

Joined: Wednesday, 23rd October 2013, 07:56

Post Tuesday, 30th June 2015, 13:49

Re: Rods should fall into 'Staves' category

Could they be then evoked straight from the inventory...?
DCSS: 97:...MfCj}SpNeBaEEGrFE{HaAKTrCK}DsFESpHu{FoArNaBe}
FeEE{HOIEMiAE}GrGlHuWrGnWrNaAKBaFi{MiDeMfDe}{DrAKTrAMGhEnGnWz}
{PaBeDjFi}OgAKPaCAGnCjOgCKMfAEAtCKSpCjDEEE{HOSu
Bloat: 17: RaRoPrPh{GuStGnCa}{ArEtZoNb}KiPaAnDrBXDBQOApDaMeAGBiOCNKAsFnFlUs{RoBoNeWi

For this message the author Sprucery has received thanks: 3
Arrhythmia, bcadren, Sar

Abyss Ambulator

Posts: 1244

Joined: Thursday, 10th March 2011, 19:45

Post Tuesday, 30th June 2015, 14:27

Re: Rods should fall into 'Staves' category

Would that mean felids could use them?
User avatar

Dis Charger

Posts: 2057

Joined: Wednesday, 7th August 2013, 08:25

Post Tuesday, 30th June 2015, 15:32

Re: Rods should fall into 'Staves' category

wheals wrote:I doubt anyone uses rod melee seriously.
Rods and clubs cause confusion on a successful stab.
I'm beginning to feel like a Cat God! Felid streaks: {FeVM^Sif Muna, FeWn^Dithmenos, FeAr^Pakellas}, {FeEE^Ashenzari, FeEn^Gozag, FeNe^Sif Muna, FeAE^Vehumet...(ongoing)}
User avatar

Ziggurat Zagger

Posts: 4478

Joined: Wednesday, 23rd October 2013, 07:56

Post Tuesday, 30th June 2015, 15:37

Re: Rods should fall into 'Staves' category

bcadren wrote:Rods and clubs cause confusion on a successful stab.

Wasn't that removed?
DCSS: 97:...MfCj}SpNeBaEEGrFE{HaAKTrCK}DsFESpHu{FoArNaBe}
FeEE{HOIEMiAE}GrGlHuWrGnWrNaAKBaFi{MiDeMfDe}{DrAKTrAMGhEnGnWz}
{PaBeDjFi}OgAKPaCAGnCjOgCKMfAEAtCKSpCjDEEE{HOSu
Bloat: 17: RaRoPrPh{GuStGnCa}{ArEtZoNb}KiPaAnDrBXDBQOApDaMeAGBiOCNKAsFnFlUs{RoBoNeWi
User avatar

Dungeon Master

Posts: 502

Joined: Wednesday, 7th March 2012, 13:25

Location: Lexington, KY, US

Post Tuesday, 30th June 2015, 17:21

Re: Rods should fall into 'Staves' category

Sprucery wrote:
bcadren wrote:Rods and clubs cause confusion on a successful stab.

Wasn't that removed?


It was removed by wheals in 0.16 development, but even before that it didn't apply to rods, only actual clubs (OBJ_WEAPONS WPN_CLUB).

For this message the author neil has received thanks:
Sprucery
User avatar

Shoals Surfer

Posts: 293

Joined: Tuesday, 19th February 2013, 18:55

Post Wednesday, 1st July 2015, 18:32

Re: Rods should fall into 'Staves' category

Sprucery wrote:Could they be then evoked straight from the inventory...?

this would pretty much turn them into wands
I love pitsprint and pitsprint culture.
dpeg wrote:The only good player is a dead player.
User avatar

Tartarus Sorceror

Posts: 1891

Joined: Monday, 1st April 2013, 04:41

Location: Toronto, Canada

Post Wednesday, 1st July 2015, 18:38

Re: Rods should fall into 'Staves' category

partial wrote:
Sprucery wrote:Could they be then evoked straight from the inventory...?

this would pretty much turn them into wands


So?
take it easy
User avatar

Shoals Surfer

Posts: 293

Joined: Tuesday, 19th February 2013, 18:55

Post Wednesday, 1st July 2015, 18:56

Re: Rods should fall into 'Staves' category

So the suggestion boils down to "Remove rods and make new wands w/ old rod effects"

Which I'm not saying is a bad idea
I love pitsprint and pitsprint culture.
dpeg wrote:The only good player is a dead player.

Vestibule Violator

Posts: 1601

Joined: Sunday, 14th July 2013, 16:36

Post Wednesday, 1st July 2015, 19:00

Re: Rods should fall into 'Staves' category

partial wrote:
Sprucery wrote:Could they be then evoked straight from the inventory...?

this would pretty much turn them into wands


Except that they would have a different charging mechanic and maybe retain the hunger cost too, so we should call them by a different name. And since we would have just gotten rid of rods, the name "rod" would then be available for this new class of things.

For this message the author Hurkyl has received thanks:
Arrhythmia
User avatar

Shoals Surfer

Posts: 293

Joined: Tuesday, 19th February 2013, 18:55

Post Wednesday, 1st July 2015, 20:11

Re: Rods should fall into 'Staves' category

Not different enough imo.
I love pitsprint and pitsprint culture.
dpeg wrote:The only good player is a dead player.

Tomb Titivator

Posts: 853

Joined: Thursday, 29th August 2013, 18:39

Post Wednesday, 1st July 2015, 20:41

Re: Rods should fall into 'Staves' category

they auto-recharge though, so they're more like...well, evocables than wands

Tomb Titivator

Posts: 808

Joined: Sunday, 23rd June 2013, 15:20

Post Wednesday, 1st July 2015, 21:05

Re: Rods should fall into 'Staves' category

Evoking Rods straight from inventory: a mighty fine buff for Ash-users, I thoroughly approve!

Return to Game Design Discussion

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 59 guests

cron
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group.
Designed by ST Software for PTF.