Is Ru poorly designed?


Although the central place for design discussion is ##crawl-dev on freenode, some may find it helpful to discuss requests and suggestions here first.

Spider Stomper

Posts: 248

Joined: Monday, 4th September 2017, 10:53

Post Thursday, 12th October 2017, 13:12

Is Ru poorly designed?

Or is it just me? I don't mean apocalypse because that is obviously broken, but Ru specifically in context of the design of the piety tiers.

Why do you get apocalypse at 5* and not 6* ? What is the point? Why would I ever take that last sacrifice, ever? Shouldn't the capstone ability be earned, at the capstone? As it is, you get a ridiculously broken ability for 5* and absolutely nothing comes after that, so Ru is a broken 5* god. This seems to me like just a gross oversight, or is there some hidden reasoning here?

Suggestion: Make apocalypse an actual capstone ability, and while we are at it, reduce the blast radius to something like 3 squares max (circular). It will still be absurdly powerful, but using it as your only source of killdudes would be a lot riskier.

Ziggurat Zagger

Posts: 4432

Joined: Friday, 8th May 2015, 17:51

Post Thursday, 12th October 2017, 13:15

Re: Is Ru poorly designed?

Ru is not an OP god and even if it was, there is nothing wrong with having OP gods (see Trog, Fedhas etc.)
Underestimated: cleaving, Deep Elf, Formicid, Vehumet, EV
Overestimated: AC, GDS
Twin account of Sandman25

For this message the author VeryAngryFelid has received thanks:
pedritolo

Spider Stomper

Posts: 248

Joined: Monday, 4th September 2017, 10:53

Post Thursday, 12th October 2017, 13:26

Re: Is Ru poorly designed?

Whether or not you think apocalypse is OP or not (its pretty much a win-button with only a restriction on the immediate rate you can mash it), the main question is why do you get it at 5* and what is the point of Ru continuing to offer you sacrifices afterwards when you have nothing to gain for taking them.

Ru feels you are powerful enough to make another sacrifice. You may:
Chop off your foot.
Chop off your arm.
Give up allies, friends, and loved ones for eternity.

Ru offers you : will clear sacrifice spam from the Abilities screen and never bother you again.
User avatar

Tartarus Sorceror

Posts: 1698

Joined: Saturday, 18th June 2016, 13:57

Post Thursday, 12th October 2017, 13:42

Re: Is Ru poorly designed?

Your aura is stronger at max piety. Not a dramatic change, but it is there. Putting the best ability as a capstone to your last sacrifice would make sense, though.
I Feel the Need--the Need for Beer
Spoiler: show
3DSBeTr 15DSFiRu 3DSMoNe 3FoHuGo 3TrArOk 3HOFEVe 3MfGlOk 4GrEEVe 3BaIEChei 3HuMoOka 3MiWnQaz 3VSFiAsh 3DrTmMakh 3DSCKXom 3OgMoOka 3NaFiOka 3FoFiOka 3MuFEVeh 3CeHuOka 3TrMoTSO 3DEFESif 3DSMoOka 3DSFiOka

For this message the author Shtopit has received thanks:
Blobbo

Spider Stomper

Posts: 248

Joined: Monday, 4th September 2017, 10:53

Post Thursday, 12th October 2017, 13:48

Re: Is Ru poorly designed?

Ahh, I knew there had to be something.. but yeah, that is not very apparent is it.

Ziggurat Zagger

Posts: 4432

Joined: Friday, 8th May 2015, 17:51

Post Thursday, 12th October 2017, 13:50

Re: Is Ru poorly designed?

Apocalypse becomes stronger at 6* too.
  Code:
Number of dice is 4 (+mute or paralysis) or 6 (+slow) or 8. Size of each die is 16.0 at min piety and 21.0 at max piety.
Underestimated: cleaving, Deep Elf, Formicid, Vehumet, EV
Overestimated: AC, GDS
Twin account of Sandman25

Spider Stomper

Posts: 248

Joined: Monday, 4th September 2017, 10:53

Post Thursday, 12th October 2017, 14:19

Re: Is Ru poorly designed?

Ah-hah.. I wonder what the dice difference is between 5* and 6*, and why do they even mention min-piety or do they mean the earliest piety you can get the ability at? For that matter, does the game tell you if you hit the natural piety cap/automatically cap piety the moment you hit 6*, or can you for example take a moderate vs a significant sacrifice, both of which get you to 6*, but the latter is at a higher internal level for that range?

Edit: The badwiki says piety caps the moment you hit 6*, so it seems like you don't necessarily get anything for taking a larger sacrifice, just need to hit the cap to max your abilities. Would be nice to know this without having to look up the god online. For example, a disclaimer any time at least one sacrifice is offered that can get you to 6*.

Dungeon Master

Posts: 625

Joined: Thursday, 23rd October 2014, 03:08

Post Friday, 13th October 2017, 02:40

Re: Is Ru poorly designed?

the game specifically tries to pick sacrifices to avoid overflowing 6* too much.

Dungeon Master

Posts: 3160

Joined: Sunday, 5th August 2012, 14:52

Post Friday, 13th October 2017, 15:16

Re: Is Ru poorly designed?

Piety increases the power of literally every Ru ability, so 6* piety is significantly more power than 5* piety. That said, I think there are probably players and characters such that it might make sense to choose to stop your Ru awakening at a certain point.

As CanOfWorms said, Ru doesn't offer sacrifices that would waste more than a small amount of piety.

Most gods get their ultimate abilities at 5*, so in this respect Ru is similar to other gods.

Edit: More specifically, for each Ru power you gain about 25% power by going from 5* to 6*: chance stop enemy attack, chance to redirect enemy attack, chance to apply status to attacker and level of status applied, hp and mp restored by draw out power, damage dealt by power leap, damage dealt by apocalypse. Damage dealt by power leap and apocalypse also scale with character XL.

For this message the author Lasty has received thanks: 2
nago, VeryAngryFelid

Cocytus Succeeder

Posts: 2229

Joined: Sunday, 18th December 2011, 13:31

Post Friday, 13th October 2017, 15:31

Re: Is Ru poorly designed?

I'd say that many other gods have the 'opaque' effect of increasing the strength of (some) of their powers according the piety level, e.g. Trog's BIA, Zin mut\hell effects protection, Dith's shadow mimic\smoke and so on, therefore the *5 capstone is kinda misleading, there's much to gain until 200 piety for many of them
screw it I hate this character I'm gonna go melee Gastronok

For this message the author nago has received thanks:
VeryAngryFelid

Ziggurat Zagger

Posts: 8786

Joined: Sunday, 5th May 2013, 08:25

Post Friday, 13th October 2017, 19:22

Re: Is Ru poorly designed?

Lasty wrote:Piety increases the power of literally every Ru ability, so 6* piety is significantly more power than 5* piety.

As CanOfWorms said, Ru doesn't offer sacrifices that would waste more than a small amount of piety.
And as this thread shows, none of these things are communicated clearly to the player.
Lasty wrote:Most gods get their ultimate abilities at 5*, so in this respect Ru is similar to other gods.
I'm tempted to call this a false equivalence, since Ru piety gain is completely different from any other god's piety gain, and you can't lose Ru piety unless you abandon Ru.
Apocalypse should probably move to 6*.

For this message the author duvessa has received thanks:
VeryAngryFelid

Dungeon Master

Posts: 3160

Joined: Sunday, 5th August 2012, 14:52

Post Friday, 13th October 2017, 19:27

Re: Is Ru poorly designed?

  Code:
# Ru
Draw Out Power ability

Taps into your inner power to restore health and magic, as well as freeing your
body and mind from external constraints, including nets, webs, constriction,
petrification, slowness, and confusion. The amount of health and magic restored
increases with piety.
%%%%
Power Leap ability

Performs an incredibly fast leap to a targeted location, causing an explosion
upon landing which damages all adjacent foes. The amount of damage done
increases with your piety and experience level.
%%%%
Apocalypse ability

Reveals Ru's truth to your enemies, dealing severe damage to all enemies in
your line of sight. Affected creatures may be paralyzed, slowed or have their
magic drained. The damage dealt increases with your piety and experience level.

I suppose specifically the * and ** passives don't have descriptions of their own and do not say this. Perhaps something to the effect of "all powers increase with piety" could be added to the Powers description.

For this message the author Lasty has received thanks: 2
nago, VeryAngryFelid
User avatar

Barkeep

Posts: 4435

Joined: Tuesday, 11th January 2011, 12:28

Post Friday, 13th October 2017, 19:39

Re: Is Ru poorly designed?

I know the text is there, but I don't actually know how to find it in-game. (OK, I spun up a character, it's in the abilities menu description mode.)

I know the UI is what it is, especially in console. It's really hard to put this stuff in a place where it won't get in players' way but is still accessible enough that they go and read it in actual practice. So, things that are communicated to the player as clearly as the UI allows may still not be communicated clearly enough that they'll get it.

Adding a power meter the abilities menu might help with this — especially communicating that power is still a thing for religions that don't use Invocations.
I am not a very good player. My mouth is a foul pit of LIES. KNOW THIS.

For this message the author njvack has received thanks: 3
duvessa, nago, VeryAngryFelid

Spider Stomper

Posts: 245

Joined: Sunday, 1st March 2015, 19:26

Post Sunday, 15th October 2017, 05:16

Re: Is Ru poorly designed?

Having apocalypse at 5* is good because it's often hard to pick the best low-yield sacrifice to get the last pip. So being able to refuse a couple of sacrifices and not be hurting is a good thing.
User avatar

Blades Runner

Posts: 568

Joined: Wednesday, 5th March 2014, 03:52

Post Tuesday, 24th October 2017, 19:01

Re: Is Ru poorly designed?

Blobbo wrote:Having apocalypse at 5* is good because it's often hard to pick the best low-yield sacrifice to get the last pip. So being able to refuse a couple of sacrifices and not be hurting is a good thing.


IMO that makes the last pip of Ru into a series of boring non-decisions. Ru becomes vastly less-interesting after 5*.

I wouldn't mind a new 5* skill that didn't suffer from exhaustion, though. I think Ru is (actually) the best designed God but is fairly terrible over-all because you can't repeatedly use skills and using one skill means you can't use the others - and Apocalypse is the best of the three in 90% of all situations, another near-non-decision.

Ziggurat Zagger

Posts: 4432

Joined: Friday, 8th May 2015, 17:51

Post Wednesday, 25th October 2017, 04:57

Re: Is Ru poorly designed?

Reptisaurus wrote:
Blobbo wrote:Having apocalypse at 5* is good because it's often hard to pick the best low-yield sacrifice to get the last pip. So being able to refuse a couple of sacrifices and not be hurting is a good thing.


IMO that makes the last pip of Ru into a series of boring non-decisions. Ru becomes vastly less-interesting after 5*.

I wouldn't mind a new 5* skill that didn't suffer from exhaustion, though. I think Ru is (actually) the best designed God but is fairly terrible over-all because you can't repeatedly use skills and using one skill means you can't use the others - and Apocalypse is the best of the three in 90% of all situations, another near-non-decision.
This is what makes Ru the best IMHO, decisions actually matter, both on strategy layer (what to sacrifice) and tactical one (what to invoke in a fight). I also like that it's a bad idea to abandon the god
Underestimated: cleaving, Deep Elf, Formicid, Vehumet, EV
Overestimated: AC, GDS
Twin account of Sandman25

Spider Stomper

Posts: 245

Joined: Sunday, 1st March 2015, 19:26

Post Thursday, 26th October 2017, 06:33

Re: Is Ru poorly designed?

Reptisaurus wrote:
Blobbo wrote:Having apocalypse at 5* is good because it's often hard to pick the best low-yield sacrifice to get the last pip. So being able to refuse a couple of sacrifices and not be hurting is a good thing.


IMO that makes the last pip of Ru into a series of boring non-decisions. Ru becomes vastly less-interesting after 5*.


Well I don't think that's necessarily a bad thing. By the same token wouldn't all gods become totally uninteresting at 6*.

My point is that with Ru, when you're rushing for piety, you want the option to overshoot 5* and still get something for it. The last pip and the final minor sacrifices to get it is the result of being able to overshoot by a bunch and still not lose out on your sacrifice value. If the best ability was at 6* then choosing sacrifices would become a horrible game of sacrifice blackjack where you have to pick the perfect set to hit 6* but not go bust. That would be annoying IMO.

Spider Stomper

Posts: 248

Joined: Monday, 4th September 2017, 10:53

Post Thursday, 26th October 2017, 12:26

Re: Is Ru poorly designed?

Yeah except as mentioned in this thread, the game purposely minimizes the final sacrifices so that you will only overshoot 6* by as little as possible.

I still think Ru should get apocalypse at 6*. I also think the piety power meter is a good idea (also for other gods).
User avatar

Blades Runner

Posts: 568

Joined: Wednesday, 5th March 2014, 03:52

Post Friday, 27th October 2017, 21:55

Re: Is Ru poorly designed?

VeryAngryFelid wrote:
Reptisaurus wrote:
Blobbo wrote:Having apocalypse at 5* is good because it's often hard to pick the best low-yield sacrifice to get the last pip. So being able to refuse a couple of sacrifices and not be hurting is a good thing.


IMO that makes the last pip of Ru into a series of boring non-decisions. Ru becomes vastly less-interesting after 5*.

I wouldn't mind a new 5* skill that didn't suffer from exhaustion, though. I think Ru is (actually) the best designed God but is fairly terrible over-all because you can't repeatedly use skills and using one skill means you can't use the others - and Apocalypse is the best of the three in 90% of all situations, another near-non-decision.
This is what makes Ru the best IMHO, decisions actually matter, both on strategy layer (what to sacrifice) and tactical one (what to invoke in a fight). I also like that it's a bad idea to abandon the god


Except that usually you invoke Apocalypse, because invoking something else can kill you because invoking something else means you can't use Apocalypse if you need to clear the screen.

For this message the author Reptisaurus has received thanks:
duvessa

Dungeon Master

Posts: 3160

Joined: Sunday, 5th August 2012, 14:52

Post Monday, 30th October 2017, 19:12

Re: Is Ru poorly designed?

Reptisaurus wrote:
VeryAngryFelid wrote:
Reptisaurus wrote:[quote="Blobbo"]Having apocalypse at 5* is good because it's often hard to pick the best low-yield sacrifice to get the last pip. So being able to refuse a couple of sacrifices and not be hurting is a good thing.


IMO that makes the last pip of Ru into a series of boring non-decisions. Ru becomes vastly less-interesting after 5*.

I wouldn't mind a new 5* skill that didn't suffer from exhaustion, though. I think Ru is (actually) the best designed God but is fairly terrible over-all because you can't repeatedly use skills and using one skill means you can't use the others - and Apocalypse is the best of the three in 90% of all situations, another near-non-decision.
This is what makes Ru the best IMHO, decisions actually matter, both on strategy layer (what to sacrifice) and tactical one (what to invoke in a fight). I also like that it's a bad idea to abandon the god


Except that usually you invoke Apocalypse, because invoking something else can kill you because invoking something else means you can't use Apocalypse if you need to clear the screen.[/quote]Keep in mind that the exhaust timers for the different abilities are different. Using draw out power only locks you out of Ru actives for a short time, but apocalypse locks you out for a very long time. The calculation is whether using one of the lesser powers can get you out of trouble to a sufficient degree that you can get away with less drain and shorter exhaustion.

Ziggurat Zagger

Posts: 6454

Joined: Tuesday, 30th October 2012, 19:06

Post Monday, 30th October 2017, 20:37

Re: Is Ru poorly designed?

Lasty wrote:Keep in mind that the exhaust timers for the different abilities are different. Using draw out power only locks you out of Ru actives for a short time, but apocalypse locks you out for a very long time. The calculation is whether using one of the lesser powers can get you out of trouble to a sufficient degree that you can get away with less drain and shorter exhaustion.

It would be nice if there was an obvious exhaustion timer associated with each ability, presently you just kind of have to guess based on past experience and Ru's draining penalty discourages experimentation for checking timer lengths.

Even a simple bar so you could say "apocalypse exhausts you twice as long as power leap" would be helpful.
Spoiler: show
This high quality signature has been hidden for your protection. To unlock it's secret, send 3 easy payments of $9.99 to me, by way of your nearest theta band or ley line. Complete your transmission by midnight tonight for a special free gift!

For this message the author Siegurt has received thanks:
VeryAngryFelid

Spider Stomper

Posts: 245

Joined: Sunday, 1st March 2015, 19:26

Post Monday, 30th October 2017, 22:26

Re: Is Ru poorly designed?

Lasty wrote:Keep in mind that the exhaust timers for the different abilities are different. Using draw out power only locks you out of Ru actives for a short time, but apocalypse locks you out for a very long time. The calculation is whether using one of the lesser powers can get you out of trouble to a sufficient degree that you can get away with less drain and shorter exhaustion.


Ok I seriously thought all Exh from all sources had the same duration and same effect. Learn more spoilery stuff every day I guess.

Slime Squisher

Posts: 344

Joined: Tuesday, 14th April 2015, 19:56

Location: France

Post Tuesday, 31st October 2017, 01:38

Re: Is Ru poorly designed?

Siegurt wrote:Even a simple bar so you could say "apocalypse exhausts you twice as long as power leap" would be helpful.

Or maybe a colour code, like drain and contam.
3 runes : MiMo^Ru, HOFi^Beogh, TrMo^Yredelemnul, GrFi^Ru, FoFi^Gozag, MiGl^Okawaru
4 runes : DDFi^Makhleb
5 runes : GrEE^Vehumet
15 runes : MiFi^Ru, NaWz^Sif Muna, GrWz^Sif Muna
I mostly play offline or online on CXC

For this message the author Fingolfin has received thanks: 2
b0rsuk, VeryAngryFelid
User avatar

Tartarus Sorceror

Posts: 1762

Joined: Monday, 14th October 2013, 01:05

Post Tuesday, 31st October 2017, 02:15

Re: Is Ru poorly designed?

I would love to have concrete numbers for things instead of more sources of ambiguity leading me to make conclusions that I find out are wrong 2 years later because someone went into the source code

For this message the author Shard1697 has received thanks: 3
duvessa, nago, VeryAngryFelid

Spider Stomper

Posts: 248

Joined: Monday, 4th September 2017, 10:53

Post Tuesday, 31st October 2017, 13:41

Re: Is Ru poorly designed?

The correct answer is to always hit apocalypse and just put all your skill points into fighting ;)

Ziggurat Zagger

Posts: 6454

Joined: Tuesday, 30th October 2012, 19:06

Post Tuesday, 31st October 2017, 19:44

Re: Is Ru poorly designed?

Shard1697 wrote:I would love to have concrete numbers for things instead of more sources of ambiguity leading me to make conclusions that I find out are wrong 2 years later because someone went into the source code

Yes, I think a literal number would be my first choice, an abstraction like a bar, my second choice, a changing colored status light as an abstraction my third choice, and no information at all my last choice.
Spoiler: show
This high quality signature has been hidden for your protection. To unlock it's secret, send 3 easy payments of $9.99 to me, by way of your nearest theta band or ley line. Complete your transmission by midnight tonight for a special free gift!

For this message the author Siegurt has received thanks:
Fingolfin

Return to Game Design Discussion

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 150 guests

Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group.
Designed by ST Software for PTF.