Metabolic Englaciation


Ask fellow adventurers how to stay alive in the deep, dark, dangerous dungeon below, or share your own accumulated wisdom.

User avatar

Abyss Ambulator

Posts: 1111

Joined: Monday, 18th March 2013, 23:23

Post Thursday, 2nd May 2013, 08:38

Metabolic Englaciation

Is ME ever worth it? I get books that have it pretty frequently, but 6 is a lot of spell levels for what appears to essentially be Mass Slow. Ignoring MR is a nice touch, but uses 2 spell schools and I'm having trouble thinking of a situation where I'd rather use that over virtually any other L6 spell.

Ziggurat Zagger

Posts: 11111

Joined: Friday, 8th February 2013, 12:00

Post Thursday, 2nd May 2013, 08:44

Re: Metabolic Englaciation

prozacelf wrote:Is ME ever worth it? I get books that have it pretty frequently, but 6 is a lot of spell levels for what appears to essentially be Mass Slow. Ignoring MR is a nice touch, but uses 2 spell schools and I'm having trouble thinking of a situation where I'd rather use that over virtually any other L6 spell.


Maybe Swamp ending with multiple Hydrae?
User avatar

Abyss Ambulator

Posts: 1111

Joined: Monday, 18th March 2013, 23:23

Post Thursday, 2nd May 2013, 08:56

Re: Metabolic Englaciation

Maybe. The trouble is nearly every situation ME would cover (that I can think of anyway) I'd probably still rather use Mass Confusion if I had it available.

Ziggurat Zagger

Posts: 11111

Joined: Friday, 8th February 2013, 12:00

Post Thursday, 2nd May 2013, 09:01

Re: Metabolic Englaciation

prozacelf wrote:Maybe. The trouble is nearly every situation ME would cover (that I can think of anyway) I'd probably still rather use Mass Confusion if I had it available.


Maybe it can be useful for Ice specialist who can't cast Confusion and is not a conjurer to use Freezing Cloud/Bolt of Cold. Though I have never had the spell memorized either, even for MfIE

Dungeon Master

Posts: 1613

Joined: Thursday, 16th December 2010, 21:54

Post Thursday, 2nd May 2013, 09:54

Re: Metabolic Englaciation

Well it's haste that stacks with haste, although certainly you might not need a second haste once you have the first one.

Ziggurat Zagger

Posts: 11111

Joined: Friday, 8th February 2013, 12:00

Post Thursday, 2nd May 2013, 11:28

Re: Metabolic Englaciation

MarvinPA wrote:Well it's haste that stacks with haste, although certainly you might not need a second haste once you have the first one.


Yes, the spell seems very powerful after analyzing code.

  Code:
duration = (roll_dice(3, pow) / 6 - random2(mons->get_experience_level()))
                    * BASELINE_DELAY


I think it has 50% chance to slow down HD 20 monsters at pow 40.
I am not sure why this important info is not present in knowledge bots/wiki.

Cocytus Succeeder

Posts: 2173

Joined: Saturday, 2nd February 2013, 09:52

Post Thursday, 2nd May 2013, 12:09

Re: Metabolic Englaciation

I wonder if anyone ever used Metabolic Englaciation.

Halls Hopper

Posts: 63

Joined: Wednesday, 23rd January 2013, 17:18

Post Thursday, 2nd May 2013, 18:02

Re: Metabolic Englaciation

Magipi wrote:I wonder if anyone ever used Metabolic Englaciation.


NOPE

Vaults Vanquisher

Posts: 486

Joined: Thursday, 28th June 2012, 17:50

Location: U.S.

Post Thursday, 2nd May 2013, 18:50

Re: Metabolic Englaciation

I did once, on a SpEn who branched into ice magic for ozo's and bolt of cold. Metabolic englaciation would usually slow stone giants in 2 or 3 casts but it seemed like just shooting bolt of cold worked better. The advantage of metabolic englaciation was its range and radius.

Ziggurat Zagger

Posts: 4055

Joined: Tuesday, 10th January 2012, 19:49

Post Thursday, 2nd May 2013, 20:51

Re: Metabolic Englaciation

some12fat2move wrote:Metabolic englaciation would usually slow stone giants in 2 or 3 casts

in fact it 100% of the time would slow them in one cast

Vaults Vanquisher

Posts: 486

Joined: Thursday, 28th June 2012, 17:50

Location: U.S.

Post Thursday, 2nd May 2013, 22:18

Re: Metabolic Englaciation

It was a long time ago so I don't remember it very well. If that's the case then it's better than I remember and probably worth starting every fight with against non-cold-resistant monsters.
User avatar

Abyss Ambulator

Posts: 1111

Joined: Monday, 18th March 2013, 23:23

Post Thursday, 2nd May 2013, 22:23

Re: Metabolic Englaciation

Thank you friends, for not telling me if it is actually worth the time!

But seriously, I never use Slow, so is having ME decent? I can read the bots all day and learn what they say. MarvinPA at least implies that hasting then casting ME can be useful....

I just always think there's something I could be doing better than "slow" as a spell effect.

Ziggurat Zagger

Posts: 4055

Joined: Tuesday, 10th January 2012, 19:49

Post Thursday, 2nd May 2013, 22:28

Re: Metabolic Englaciation

why dont you try it and decide for yourself

this is kind of the best way to figure out if spells are good

For this message the author crate has received thanks:
prozacelf
User avatar

Abyss Ambulator

Posts: 1111

Joined: Monday, 18th March 2013, 23:23

Post Thursday, 2nd May 2013, 22:39

Re: Metabolic Englaciation

You are totally right crate.

That is actually a good thing to say. I'll never trust the bs about spells thrown around here.

I think mass confusion and tukima's dance are a lot better than the other L5-6 spells. But I'll try to do it.
User avatar

Abyss Ambulator

Posts: 1111

Joined: Monday, 18th March 2013, 23:23

Post Friday, 3rd May 2013, 00:05

Re: Metabolic Englaciation

Tried it in wizmode. Seems useful, but probably like something I'd only use to save my ass anyway. Which means I'm too bad a player to realize when I should use it, and I'll just die anyway =)

Ziggurat Zagger

Posts: 11111

Joined: Friday, 8th February 2013, 12:00

Post Friday, 3rd May 2013, 06:37

Re: Metabolic Englaciation

I think it can be useful for invistabbers and Chei worshipers, when they can't cast Haste because of glow/god.
User avatar

Abyss Ambulator

Posts: 1111

Joined: Monday, 18th March 2013, 23:23

Post Friday, 3rd May 2013, 08:26

Re: Metabolic Englaciation

Again, I'd rather use MC than ME, especially if if I have hexes trained up. And I'd take Xom before I took Chei as my god :)

It's more useful than I originally believed, but I'm never going to use it regularly I don't think. Unless one of these MfIEs I've been making makes it far enough to need a spell like that.

Ziggurat Zagger

Posts: 11111

Joined: Friday, 8th February 2013, 12:00

Post Friday, 3rd May 2013, 08:44

Re: Metabolic Englaciation

prozacelf wrote:Again, I'd rather use MC than ME, especially if if I have hexes trained up. And I'd take Xom before I took Chei as my god :)

It's more useful than I originally believed, but I'm never going to use it regularly I don't think. Unless one of these MfIEs I've been making makes it far enough to need a spell like that.


If you mean Mephitic Cloud as MC, I believe ME is much better vs high HD or rPois monsters.
If Mass Confusion, then I am not sure what's better. ME does not work vs undead but does not check MR
User avatar

Abyss Ambulator

Posts: 1111

Joined: Monday, 18th March 2013, 23:23

Post Friday, 3rd May 2013, 09:02

Re: Metabolic Englaciation

I meant Mass Confusion. Running seems like the best plan in either situation though, although mass confusion will at least affect some of the undead.
User avatar

Abyss Ambulator

Posts: 1111

Joined: Monday, 18th March 2013, 23:23

Post Friday, 3rd May 2013, 09:04

Re: Metabolic Englaciation

And experience tells me that mass confusion is much more effective than mephitic cloud. Although I could be wrong.

E: I usually have 15+ hexes when i get mass confusion; I rarely have any relevant school above 5 when i get mephitic cloud.

Return to Dungeon Crawling Advice

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 56 guests

cron
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group.
Designed by ST Software for PTF.