Is this Randart worth?


Ask fellow adventurers how to stay alive in the deep, dark, dangerous dungeon below, or share your own accumulated wisdom.

Temple Termagant

Posts: 14

Joined: Thursday, 6th October 2016, 04:39

Post Sunday, 9th October 2016, 22:51

Is this Randart worth?

I've been constantly asking myself this, and so I was wondering if there was a general place to ask this question?

Anyways I have two scenarios I would like advice on:

Necklace choice -> regen amulet OR {Reflect *Drain rElec Dex+8 Slay-5 SH+4}
weapon choice -> + 9 trident of draining OR +8 trident {flame, *Contam Int+2 Dex+3} (also is a +4 spear {holy, rN+ SInv Stlth+} worth keeping around?)

Crypt Cleanser

Posts: 720

Joined: Friday, 6th September 2013, 09:17

Post Sunday, 9th October 2016, 22:56

Re: Is this Randart worth?

Regen and draining. Slay-5 is terrible if you're meleeing, and for low-damage weapons, like a trident, an additive brand, like draining, is better. That said, trident is crap. Move over to either glaive or demon trident.

And no, that spear is useless.

For this message the author stickyfingers has received thanks:
VeryAngryFelid

Temple Termagant

Posts: 14

Joined: Thursday, 6th October 2016, 04:39

Post Sunday, 9th October 2016, 23:11

Re: Is this Randart worth?

Would a + 2 demon trident of piercing be better?

Ziggurat Zagger

Posts: 4432

Joined: Friday, 8th May 2015, 17:51

Post Sunday, 9th October 2016, 23:12

Re: Is this Randart worth?

Yes

Edit. No, I was wrong.

  Code:
Dungeon Crawl Stone Soup version 0.18.1
Attack: Merfolk Gladiator vs. yak (4000 rounds) (2016/10/09/19:15:31)
Merfolk Gladiator: XL 1   Str 15   Int 7   Dex 14
Wielding: +9 trident of draining, Skill: Polearms
yak: HD 7   AC 4   EV 7

  Polearms | AvHitDam | MaxDam | Accuracy | AvDam | AvTime | AvSpeed | AvEffDam
         0 |      9,8 |     30 |      79% |   7,8 |   130  |  0,77 |      6,0
         1 |     10,0 |     31 |      80% |   8,0 |   125  |  0,80 |      6,4
         2 |      9,9 |     31 |      79% |   7,9 |   120  |  0,83 |      6,6
         3 |     10,0 |     34 |      80% |   8,0 |   115  |  0,87 |      7,0
         4 |     10,1 |     32 |      80% |   8,1 |   110  |  0,91 |      7,4
         5 |     10,5 |     34 |      79% |   8,4 |   105  |  0,95 |      8,0
         6 |     10,4 |     31 |      80% |   8,4 |   100  |  1,00 |      8,4
         7 |     10,4 |     36 |      80% |   8,5 |    95  |  1,05 |      8,9
         8 |     10,5 |     34 |      79% |   8,4 |    90  |  1,11 |      9,3
         9 |     10,7 |     37 |      81% |   8,7 |    85  |  1,18 |     10,2
        10 |     10,6 |     39 |      81% |   8,6 |    80  |  1,25 |     10,7
        11 |     11,0 |     35 |      80% |   8,9 |    75  |  1,33 |     11,8
        12 |     11,1 |     36 |      82% |   9,1 |    70  |  1,43 |     13,0
        13 |     11,1 |     36 |      82% |   9,2 |    65  |  1,54 |     14,2
        14 |     11,0 |     35 |      81% |   9,0 |    60  |  1,67 |     15,0
        15 |     11,4 |     37 |      82% |   9,4 |    60  |  1,67 |     15,7
        16 |     11,4 |     37 |      82% |   9,5 |    60  |  1,67 |     15,8
        17 |     11,6 |     40 |      80% |   9,4 |    60  |  1,67 |     15,6
        18 |     11,4 |     40 |      81% |   9,4 |    60  |  1,67 |     15,6
        19 |     11,8 |     40 |      82% |   9,7 |    60  |  1,67 |     16,2
        20 |     11,8 |     39 |      82% |   9,8 |    60  |  1,67 |     16,3
        21 |     12,2 |     43 |      83% |  10,2 |    60  |  1,67 |     17,0
        22 |     12,1 |     40 |      83% |  10,1 |    60  |  1,67 |     16,9
        23 |     12,3 |     44 |      82% |  10,1 |    60  |  1,67 |     16,9
        24 |     12,5 |     46 |      83% |  10,4 |    60  |  1,67 |     17,4
        25 |     12,4 |     43 |      84% |  10,5 |    60  |  1,67 |     17,4
        26 |     12,6 |     46 |      83% |  10,5 |    60  |  1,67 |     17,6
        27 |     12,8 |     48 |      83% |  10,7 |    60  |  1,67 |     17,8
-----------------------------------

  Code:
Dungeon Crawl Stone Soup version 0.18.1
Attack: Merfolk Gladiator vs. yak (4000 rounds) (2016/10/09/19:15:57)
Merfolk Gladiator: XL 1   Str 15   Int 7   Dex 14
Wielding: +2 demon trident of piercing, Skill: Polearms
yak: HD 7   AC 4   EV 7

  Polearms | AvHitDam | MaxDam | Accuracy | AvDam | AvTime | AvSpeed | AvEffDam
         0 |      7,5 |     24 |      75% |   5,7 |   130  |  0,77 |      4,4
         1 |      7,5 |     23 |      74% |   5,6 |   125  |  0,80 |      4,5
         2 |      7,5 |     23 |      76% |   5,7 |   120  |  0,83 |      4,8
         3 |      7,6 |     24 |      76% |   5,8 |   115  |  0,87 |      5,0
         4 |      7,8 |     23 |      75% |   5,9 |   110  |  0,91 |      5,3
         5 |      8,0 |     26 |      77% |   6,2 |   105  |  0,95 |      5,9
         6 |      7,9 |     26 |      77% |   6,1 |   100  |  1,00 |      6,1
         7 |      8,4 |     27 |      76% |   6,4 |    95  |  1,05 |      6,7
         8 |      8,5 |     27 |      79% |   6,8 |    90  |  1,11 |      7,5
         9 |      8,6 |     29 |      78% |   6,7 |    85  |  1,18 |      7,9
        10 |      8,9 |     27 |      77% |   6,9 |    80  |  1,25 |      8,6
        11 |      8,8 |     31 |      78% |   6,9 |    75  |  1,33 |      9,2
        12 |      8,8 |     31 |      79% |   7,0 |    70  |  1,43 |     10,0
        13 |      9,3 |     32 |      78% |   7,3 |    65  |  1,54 |     11,3
        14 |      9,2 |     33 |      78% |   7,2 |    60  |  1,67 |     12,0
        15 |      9,5 |     34 |      79% |   7,5 |    60  |  1,67 |     12,5
        16 |      9,5 |     33 |      80% |   7,6 |    60  |  1,67 |     12,7
        17 |      9,9 |     36 |      80% |   7,9 |    60  |  1,67 |     13,2
        18 |     10,1 |     33 |      78% |   8,0 |    60  |  1,67 |     13,3
        19 |     10,1 |     37 |      80% |   8,1 |    60  |  1,67 |     13,6
        20 |     10,4 |     36 |      80% |   8,4 |    60  |  1,67 |     14,0
        21 |     10,5 |     38 |      79% |   8,3 |    60  |  1,67 |     13,9
        22 |     10,6 |     37 |      81% |   8,6 |    60  |  1,67 |     14,4
        23 |     10,9 |     38 |      81% |   8,9 |    60  |  1,67 |     14,8
        24 |     11,0 |     39 |      81% |   9,0 |    60  |  1,67 |     14,9
        25 |     11,2 |     39 |      80% |   9,0 |    60  |  1,67 |     14,9
        26 |     11,2 |     42 |      81% |   9,1 |    60  |  1,67 |     15,1
        27 |     11,6 |     42 |      82% |   9,5 |    60  |  1,67 |     15,9
-----------------------------------
Underestimated: cleaving, Deep Elf, Formicid, Vehumet, EV
Overestimated: AC, GDS
Twin account of Sandman25

For this message the author VeryAngryFelid has received thanks:
Sar

Temple Termagant

Posts: 14

Joined: Thursday, 6th October 2016, 04:39

Post Sunday, 9th October 2016, 23:28

Re: Is this Randart worth?

Where did you get that calculator from?
User avatar

Tartarus Sorceror

Posts: 1762

Joined: Monday, 14th October 2013, 01:05

Post Sunday, 9th October 2016, 23:32

Re: Is this Randart worth?

it's fight sim(fsim), which is a function in crawl wizard mode(which is a debug-esque mode which lets you spawn stuff/ alter stuff etc.) Download local crawl and you can use it.

Tartarus Sorceror

Posts: 1739

Joined: Tuesday, 13th March 2012, 02:48

Post Sunday, 9th October 2016, 23:53

Re: Is this Randart worth?

wincelet wrote:Would a + 2 demon trident of piercing be better?


If it's not an artifact, you should keep it around to enchant up and hopefully rebrand.

Ziggurat Zagger

Posts: 8786

Joined: Sunday, 5th May 2013, 08:25

Post Monday, 10th October 2016, 00:23

Re: Is this Randart worth?

Shard1697 wrote:it's fight sim(fsim), which is a function in crawl wizard mode(which is a debug-esque mode which lets you spawn stuff/ alter stuff etc.) Download local crawl and you can use it.
It's also what you should use to make your weapon choices, instead of trusting people on Tavern (as you can see, they are often wrong).

For this message the author duvessa has received thanks:
VeryAngryFelid
User avatar

Blades Runner

Posts: 546

Joined: Friday, 2nd October 2015, 14:42

Post Monday, 10th October 2016, 01:13

Re: Is this Randart worth?

Wow. +2 demon trident of piercing better than +9 demon trident of draining...? I am floored.
The Original Discourse Respecter

Sar

User avatar

Ziggurat Zagger

Posts: 6418

Joined: Friday, 6th July 2012, 12:48

Post Monday, 10th October 2016, 01:15

Re: Is this Randart worth?

the draining trident isn't demonic???

For this message the author Sar has received thanks:
VeryAngryFelid
User avatar

Tartarus Sorceror

Posts: 1762

Joined: Monday, 14th October 2013, 01:05

Post Monday, 10th October 2016, 01:18

Re: Is this Randart worth?

duvessa wrote:
Shard1697 wrote:it's fight sim(fsim), which is a function in crawl wizard mode(which is a debug-esque mode which lets you spawn stuff/ alter stuff etc.) Download local crawl and you can use it.
It's also what you should use to make your weapon choices, instead of trusting people on Tavern (as you can see, they are often wrong).
You should, but it's kind of annoying/time consuming to use it repeatedly. so instead go with your gut, use higher base damage unless enchant is huge, and use fsim to settle dumb arguments on tavern

For this message the author Shard1697 has received thanks: 7
BabyRage, cerebovssquire, Cimanyd, DracheReborn, nago, VeryAngryFelid, ydeve
User avatar

Blades Runner

Posts: 546

Joined: Friday, 2nd October 2015, 14:42

Post Monday, 10th October 2016, 01:51

Re: Is this Randart worth?

Sar wrote:the draining trident isn't demonic???


oic. That is at least close for some skill levels.
The Original Discourse Respecter
User avatar

Tomb Titivator

Posts: 911

Joined: Thursday, 17th December 2015, 02:36

Post Monday, 10th October 2016, 03:21

Re: Is this Randart worth?

goodcoolguy wrote:
Sar wrote:the draining trident isn't demonic???


oic. That is at least close for some skill levels.

?? - the draining trident is better than the demon trident at all skill levels, by a couple of points.
User avatar

Slime Squisher

Posts: 338

Joined: Wednesday, 20th November 2013, 11:37

Post Monday, 10th October 2016, 07:27

Re: Is this Randart worth?

Shard1697 wrote:Download local crawl and you can use it.

LOL I always curious about people who take wizmode so serious that one should download local crawl to use it!
Guys, just discover crawl.berotato.org:8081 for yourselves!

Vaults Vanquisher

Posts: 451

Joined: Friday, 24th June 2016, 14:09

Post Monday, 10th October 2016, 18:50

Re: Is this Randart worth?

All you guys are wrong, just whip out a calculator and crunch the numbers yourself, this is actually what I do

Abyss Ambulator

Posts: 1193

Joined: Friday, 16th January 2015, 20:20

Post Monday, 10th October 2016, 18:57

Re: Is this Randart worth?

Calculator? Pfft. I make little marks in the dirt with a stick.
User avatar

Pandemonium Purger

Posts: 1386

Joined: Sunday, 5th April 2015, 22:37

Post Monday, 10th October 2016, 23:32

Re: Is this Randart worth?

What fighting level was the Fsim run at? That can impact the results. A Chei character with 27 fighting (extreme example) should find the demon trident to be better.

Also, randarts can be better or worse than non artifact items. Jewlry randarts are generaly the most usable as they don't have an enchantment level that can roll low. wepon randarts are the least usable as you need to roll a high enchantment and a good base type to be good.
http://crawl.akrasiac.org/scoring/playe ... speon.html. I started playing in 0.16.1
I achieved greatplayer in less than a year.
Remove food

Ziggurat Zagger

Posts: 6454

Joined: Tuesday, 30th October 2012, 19:06

Post Tuesday, 11th October 2016, 00:23

Re: Is this Randart worth?

If I were to use the common tavern's rule-of-thumb I would estimate that the base damage difference (4) is worth 1.5 as much as the the enchantment difference (7)
Making a +9 trident better than a +2 demon trident, at least until you get it enchanted a few more points.

I would further estimate that draining is about 3 points better than piercing, so I would estimate (without actually checking) that you would need about 4-5 more enchantment on the dtrident before it beats the trident (Or possibly a better brand and less enchantment)
Spoiler: show
This high quality signature has been hidden for your protection. To unlock it's secret, send 3 easy payments of $9.99 to me, by way of your nearest theta band or ley line. Complete your transmission by midnight tonight for a special free gift!

For this message the author Siegurt has received thanks:
nago

Ziggurat Zagger

Posts: 4432

Joined: Friday, 8th May 2015, 17:51

Post Tuesday, 11th October 2016, 00:47

Re: Is this Randart worth?

WingedEspeon wrote:What fighting level was the Fsim run at?


Fighting was changed to 10, all other stats are of XL 1 MfGl.
Underestimated: cleaving, Deep Elf, Formicid, Vehumet, EV
Overestimated: AC, GDS
Twin account of Sandman25
User avatar

Barkeep

Posts: 4435

Joined: Tuesday, 11th January 2011, 12:28

Post Tuesday, 11th October 2016, 01:00

Re: Is this Randart worth?

lesson learned: draining is boss
I am not a very good player. My mouth is a foul pit of LIES. KNOW THIS.

Ziggurat Zagger

Posts: 4432

Joined: Friday, 8th May 2015, 17:51

Post Tuesday, 11th October 2016, 01:15

Re: Is this Randart worth?

+2 trident of draining is worse than the d. trident. Boss is the combo of +9 and draining

  Code:
Attack: Merfolk Gladiator vs. yak (4000 rounds) (2016/10/10/21:14:31)
Merfolk Gladiator: XL 1   Str 15   Int 7   Dex 14
Wielding: +2 trident of draining, Skill: Polearms
yak: HD 7   AC 4   EV 7

  Polearms | AvHitDam | MaxDam | Accuracy | AvDam | AvTime | AvSpeed | AvEffDam
         0 |      6,1 |     24 |      74% |   4,5 |   130  |  0,77 |      3,5
         1 |      6,2 |     22 |      75% |   4,7 |   125  |  0,80 |      3,8
         2 |      6,2 |     23 |      74% |   4,6 |   120  |  0,83 |      3,8
         3 |      6,2 |     22 |      77% |   4,8 |   115  |  0,87 |      4,2
         4 |      6,3 |     22 |      77% |   4,9 |   110  |  0,91 |      4,4
         5 |      6,4 |     23 |      76% |   4,9 |   105  |  0,95 |      4,7
         6 |      6,6 |     25 |      77% |   5,1 |   100  |  1,00 |      5,1
         7 |      6,7 |     26 |      77% |   5,2 |    95  |  1,05 |      5,5
         8 |      6,8 |     26 |      77% |   5,3 |    90  |  1,11 |      5,9
         9 |      6,9 |     25 |      76% |   5,3 |    85  |  1,18 |      6,2
        10 |      7,0 |     25 |      78% |   5,5 |    80  |  1,25 |      6,9
        11 |      7,2 |     29 |      79% |   5,7 |    75  |  1,34 |      7,6
        12 |      7,1 |     28 |      79% |   5,6 |    70  |  1,43 |      8,0
        13 |      7,3 |     28 |      79% |   5,8 |    65  |  1,54 |      8,9
        14 |      7,4 |     29 |      78% |   5,9 |    60  |  1,67 |      9,8
        15 |      7,6 |     30 |      79% |   6,1 |    60  |  1,67 |     10,1
        16 |      7,6 |     33 |      79% |   6,1 |    60  |  1,67 |     10,2
        17 |      7,7 |     32 |      79% |   6,1 |    60  |  1,67 |     10,2
        18 |      7,9 |     32 |      79% |   6,3 |    60  |  1,67 |     10,5
        19 |      8,0 |     32 |      80% |   6,5 |    60  |  1,67 |     10,8
        20 |      8,1 |     33 |      80% |   6,5 |    60  |  1,67 |     10,9
        21 |      8,3 |     37 |      80% |   6,7 |    60  |  1,67 |     11,2
        22 |      8,4 |     32 |      81% |   6,9 |    60  |  1,67 |     11,5
        23 |      8,3 |     34 |      80% |   6,8 |    60  |  1,67 |     11,3
        24 |      8,7 |     34 |      81% |   7,1 |    60  |  1,67 |     11,8
        25 |      8,6 |     32 |      80% |   6,9 |    60  |  1,67 |     11,5
        26 |      9,0 |     40 |      81% |   7,3 |    60  |  1,67 |     12,2
        27 |      8,9 |     38 |      80% |   7,2 |    60  |  1,67 |     12,0
Underestimated: cleaving, Deep Elf, Formicid, Vehumet, EV
Overestimated: AC, GDS
Twin account of Sandman25
User avatar

Tartarus Sorceror

Posts: 1762

Joined: Monday, 14th October 2013, 01:05

Post Tuesday, 11th October 2016, 04:44

Re: Is this Randart worth?

Draining does enough extra damage to already be pretty good without the debuff, which it also has-and it works on most pre-extended enemies. Aside from vampiric/speed, draining might be my favorite brand. Or tied with antimagic right below those two.
User avatar

Barkeep

Posts: 4435

Joined: Tuesday, 11th January 2011, 12:28

Post Tuesday, 11th October 2016, 13:56

Re: Is this Randart worth?

I've never quite gotten the vamp love, to be honest. It's not a bad brand but it's never seemed better than doing more damage.
I am not a very good player. My mouth is a foul pit of LIES. KNOW THIS.
User avatar

Ziggurat Zagger

Posts: 4478

Joined: Wednesday, 23rd October 2013, 07:56

Post Tuesday, 11th October 2016, 14:01

Re: Is this Randart worth?

njvack wrote:I've never quite gotten the vamp love, to be honest. It's not a bad brand but it's never seemed better than doing more damage.

Have you played a game with a good vamp weapon?
DCSS: 97:...MfCj}SpNeBaEEGrFE{HaAKTrCK}DsFESpHu{FoArNaBe}
FeEE{HOIEMiAE}GrGlHuWrGnWrNaAKBaFi{MiDeMfDe}{DrAKTrAMGhEnGnWz}
{PaBeDjFi}OgAKPaCAGnCjOgCKMfAEAtCKSpCjDEEE{HOSu
Bloat: 17: RaRoPrPh{GuStGnCa}{ArEtZoNb}KiPaAnDrBXDBQOApDaMeAGBiOCNKAsFnFlUs{RoBoNeWi

For this message the author Sprucery has received thanks: 3
nago, Sar, VeryAngryFelid
User avatar

Barkeep

Posts: 4435

Joined: Tuesday, 11th January 2011, 12:28

Post Tuesday, 11th October 2016, 14:27

Re: Is this Randart worth?

Yeah? It seemed like a good brand but not necessarily better than doing more damage? Sometimes I have a roughly equivalent, say, vamp and freezing weapon and I normally wind up using the damage brand. I really want to like it. It might just be that I feel like I already hit tab like 20,000 times in a winning game and a weapon that lets me do that less is nice.

It's somewhat complicated by the fact that I often want to pincushion things with a bow or something, and vamp makes that extremely irritating to do.
I am not a very good player. My mouth is a foul pit of LIES. KNOW THIS.
User avatar

Barkeep

Posts: 4435

Joined: Tuesday, 11th January 2011, 12:28

Post Tuesday, 11th October 2016, 14:28

Re: Is this Randart worth?

Also, by "good" I mean things like lajatang and greatsword.
I am not a very good player. My mouth is a foul pit of LIES. KNOW THIS.

Tomb Titivator

Posts: 832

Joined: Wednesday, 17th April 2013, 13:28

Post Tuesday, 11th October 2016, 14:45

Re: Is this Randart worth?

Vamp doesn't do more damage, but it makes it very hard to die. Vamp and antimagic are good defensive brands.

Ziggurat Zagger

Posts: 4432

Joined: Friday, 8th May 2015, 17:51

Post Tuesday, 11th October 2016, 15:10

Re: Is this Randart worth?

For me vamp weapon saves real time and also replaces arrow keys, 5, q, r, v, i etc. with tab.
Underestimated: cleaving, Deep Elf, Formicid, Vehumet, EV
Overestimated: AC, GDS
Twin account of Sandman25

For this message the author VeryAngryFelid has received thanks: 3
nago, Rast, Sar
User avatar

Barkeep

Posts: 4435

Joined: Tuesday, 11th January 2011, 12:28

Post Tuesday, 11th October 2016, 15:17

Re: Is this Randart worth?

OK. I'm totally willing to believe I am just bad at using vamp somehow. Thanks!
I am not a very good player. My mouth is a foul pit of LIES. KNOW THIS.

Sar

User avatar

Ziggurat Zagger

Posts: 6418

Joined: Friday, 6th July 2012, 12:48

Post Tuesday, 11th October 2016, 15:25

Re: Is this Randart worth?

learndb wrote:<bmfx> minqmay: feel free to add it to ??bmfx, because i will stand by these words. any damaging (including vorpal) brand > vamp.

I guess different strokes?

Crypt Cleanser

Posts: 720

Joined: Friday, 6th September 2013, 09:17

Post Tuesday, 11th October 2016, 15:26

Re: Is this Randart worth?

If vamp doesn't help you in any way, then you must be using really good tactics. Keep up the good work!

For this message the author stickyfingers has received thanks: 2
nago, Sar

Ziggurat Zagger

Posts: 4432

Joined: Friday, 8th May 2015, 17:51

Post Tuesday, 11th October 2016, 15:27

Re: Is this Randart worth?

njvack wrote:OK. I'm totally willing to believe I am just bad at using vamp somehow. Thanks!


Maybe your characters didn't have good defenses, I imagine it can be hard to tab monsters as Op or early Mu.
Underestimated: cleaving, Deep Elf, Formicid, Vehumet, EV
Overestimated: AC, GDS
Twin account of Sandman25

Tartarus Sorceror

Posts: 1739

Joined: Tuesday, 13th March 2012, 02:48

Post Tuesday, 11th October 2016, 17:10

Re: Is this Randart worth?

Sar wrote:
learndb wrote:<bmfx> minqmay: feel free to add it to ??bmfx, because i will stand by these words. any damaging (including vorpal) brand > vamp.

I guess different strokes?


Yes. Also felid is the best race, spells above level 3 are bad, Call Merchant is bad, and all monsters with speed = 10 are harmless.

For this message the author Rast has received thanks: 2
dowan, VeryAngryFelid
User avatar

Tartarus Sorceror

Posts: 1762

Joined: Monday, 14th October 2013, 01:05

Post Tuesday, 11th October 2016, 19:50

Re: Is this Randart worth?

vamp weapon really really helps you go fast

For this message the author Shard1697 has received thanks:
dowan

Tartarus Sorceror

Posts: 1694

Joined: Tuesday, 31st March 2015, 20:34

Post Wednesday, 12th October 2016, 13:43

Re: Is this Randart worth?

A high damage weapon with vamp on a character with decent defenses can be awesome, never having to stop to heal up really speeds up the game. The best version of this is a vamp battleaxe, it's basically a free ticket to zot! Assuming you can keep your hubris in check...

I like to use a ranged weapon as well, and vamp really does get in the way of that. Vamp is in that really good but really annoying to use category for me.

Return to Dungeon Crawling Advice

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 115 guests

Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group.
Designed by ST Software for PTF.