dowan wrote:If you have to come up with a bunch of ways to deal with a monster
Isn't that the complete opposite of what logic would suggest? If you
can come up with as you say a 'bunch' of ways to deal with a monster, doesn't the more ways the monster can be taken down mean the less dangerous that monster really is?
Regardless, nobody agrees as to what's 'dangerous' or not, and the real answer is always 'it depends'. There are times and characters for which hydras, or any other monster, will be trivial, and times when they will not. Both situations have to be taken into consideration. But the fact that they are a ten speed melee-only monster (until swamp, when they may be faster) needs to be taken into consideration as well.
So the real question is whether a particular monster who is strong to slashing type weapons needs to be removed, due to it forcing slashing weapon users to use alternate tactics to fight it. And also consider that this 'alternate tactic' isn't simple 'praying and hoping you found MR for banishers at a low level, or rF for OOFs', this alternate tactic can be one of many many different alternate solutions. The only difference is it's a modification to your way of attacking that's required (and potentially even training, for a few of the many solutions), whereas most other special monsters require you to modify your defenses a bit (or find other solutions of course like running, tele, haste, etc, which are good solutions for anything).
E: Well, that would be the real question if that was what this thread was still about. :p