Stacking EV with enemy inaccuracy?


Ask fellow adventurers how to stay alive in the deep, dark, dangerous dungeon below, or share your own accumulated wisdom.

User avatar

Swamp Slogger

Posts: 132

Joined: Tuesday, 15th November 2011, 23:26

Post Wednesday, 22nd January 2014, 05:46

Stacking EV with enemy inaccuracy?

Basically I'm wondering how well stacking absurdly high evasion with enemy inaccuracy would be, specifically from the new god in Trunk. It certainly feels more survivable but I'm curious about the numbers behind it.
"Crawl is cruel. But we keep coming back to it like an abusive boyfriend. It keeps telling us how it will be different this time by giving us early robes of the archmagi and staves of fire. Then it backhands you with a Centaur on D4." ~Me
User avatar

Tomb Titivator

Posts: 793

Joined: Tuesday, 28th January 2014, 16:08

Post Friday, 31st January 2014, 23:41

Re: Stacking EV with enemy inaccuracy?

EV tanking is a serious gamble. Even with say, 100 EV there will still be a hardcoded 5% chance that whatever *thing* will hit you. However, I don't know how this interacts with the inaccuracy penalties monsters receive from umbra. It's probably not gonna make you all that more durable, but that's just a guess. I would probably use the inacc penalties to my advantage with a higher AC rather than EV. All that said, I'm probably completely wrong.
If you are offended by something I've posted, just PM me. It probably wasn't intentional.

dck

Vestibule Violator

Posts: 1653

Joined: Tuesday, 30th July 2013, 11:29

Post Saturday, 1st February 2014, 00:06

Re: Stacking EV with enemy inaccuracy?

The inaccuracy umbra gives to monsters is pretty good and you can in most situations pretend having around say, 4-6 more EV when you have it.
EV isn't a gamble at all, since none of the armours that allow your EV to be good do anything to keep your AC low and you have have good AC and great EV without extraordinary findings.
Also all undead have umbravision, so they get no penalty, although I think it was removed for demons a while ago.
User avatar

Tomb Titivator

Posts: 793

Joined: Tuesday, 28th January 2014, 16:08

Post Saturday, 1st February 2014, 00:25

Re: Stacking EV with enemy inaccuracy?

dck wrote:EV isn't a gamble at all, since none of the armours that allow your EV to be good do anything to keep your AC low and you have have good AC and great EV without extraordinary findings.


I'm not really sure what you mean here.

I was saying EV was a gamble under the assumption that dodging was your best bet and a good AC just wasn't in the cards yet. IE you're a spriggan who hasn't encountered dragon armour.
If you are offended by something I've posted, just PM me. It probably wasn't intentional.

Dis Charger

Posts: 2064

Joined: Wednesday, 9th January 2013, 19:44

Post Saturday, 1st February 2014, 00:27

Re: Stacking EV with enemy inaccuracy?

It's always good to have some AC anyway. And it's not that hard to get. You just need to enchant a dragon armour, which you have enough str for. As for the roll, I think it sould be simple: ev+1+d1d4 from umbra against the enemy's to hit roll. And probably after ev30 umbra gives more than a bit of EV, as there is the stepdown. And it gives a nice edge at the beginning, since any agile character should have 15-20 early in the game and with umbra it should be very good from early on.

Ziggurat Zagger

Posts: 8786

Joined: Sunday, 5th May 2013, 08:25

Post Saturday, 1st February 2014, 00:42

Re: Stacking EV with enemy inaccuracy?

Greyr wrote:EV tanking is a serious gamble. Even with say, 100 EV there will still be a hardcoded 5% chance that whatever *thing* will hit you.
That chance is closest to 2%, not 5%. (Also, even a rat will hit you more than 2% of the time with only 100 EV.)
User avatar

Tomb Titivator

Posts: 793

Joined: Tuesday, 28th January 2014, 16:08

Post Saturday, 1st February 2014, 00:50

Re: Stacking EV with enemy inaccuracy?

duvessa wrote:
Greyr wrote:EV tanking is a serious gamble. Even with say, 100 EV there will still be a hardcoded 5% chance that whatever *thing* will hit you.
That chance is closest to 2%, not 5%. (Also, even a rat will hit you more than 2% of the time with only 100 EV.)



I coulda swore I read somewhere it was 5%. 100 was supposed to be a theoretical nonsense number, but that is good to know :)
If you are offended by something I've posted, just PM me. It probably wasn't intentional.

Crypt Cleanser

Posts: 747

Joined: Friday, 6th January 2012, 12:30

Post Saturday, 1st February 2014, 01:31

Re: Stacking EV with enemy inaccuracy?

I've seen the 5% thing in the bots EV page. Not sure if this is what the real game code has.
http://pastebin.com/f6eec73ed

For this message the author Wahaha has received thanks:
Greyr

Ziggurat Zagger

Posts: 8786

Joined: Sunday, 5th May 2013, 08:25

Post Saturday, 1st February 2014, 03:13

Re: Stacking EV with enemy inaccuracy?

Given that said constant doesn't even seem to exist anymore I'm gonna say no. My 2% figure simply came from using fsim.

Barkeep

Posts: 3890

Joined: Wednesday, 14th August 2013, 23:25

Location: USA

Post Saturday, 1st February 2014, 07:50

Re: Stacking EV with enemy inaccuracy?

Greyr wrote:EV tanking is a serious gamble. Even with say, 100 EV there will still be a hardcoded 5% chance that whatever *thing* will hit you. However, I don't know how this interacts with the inaccuracy penalties monsters receive from umbra. It's probably not gonna make you all that more durable, but that's just a guess. I would probably use the inacc penalties to my advantage with a higher AC rather than EV. All that said, I'm probably completely wrong.


Putting aside the question of exact percentages for a moment, the other thing (which supports your ultimate point) is that with 100 EV, you will dodge fireball 0 out of 100 times. Same with airstrike, the LRD blast radius, shatter, and several other attacks that ignore EV, but which do check AC. And then paralyze and certain other situations can drastically lower your EV (and paralyze can't be avoided through EV). And then there are those nasty attacks that ignore both EV and AC. So those are all things to consider. Maybe you were wrong about the exact numbers, but I don't think your overall analysis is incorrect. So you are not completely wrong. No matter how high your EV, you still should strive for good AC, and you still want good max HP. This is due to the nature of Crawl (permadeath), the nature of EV, and also the existence of various attacks that will bypass certain kinds of defenses.

Slime Squisher

Posts: 368

Joined: Thursday, 11th April 2013, 21:07

Post Saturday, 1st February 2014, 11:00

Re: Stacking EV with enemy inaccuracy?

dck wrote:Also all undead have umbravision, so they get no penalty,


If this is really a thing it should be an unthing because I have trouble imagining a more opaque mechanic.

dck

Vestibule Violator

Posts: 1653

Joined: Tuesday, 30th July 2013, 11:29

Post Saturday, 1st February 2014, 17:36

Re: Stacking EV with enemy inaccuracy?

Well umbra is a mechanic that predates Dith and the only source of it that used to exist were servitors so I guess it mostly existed not to have them screw with their friends in the few places they spawn at.

Mines Malingerer

Posts: 48

Joined: Friday, 26th July 2013, 13:25

Post Saturday, 1st February 2014, 18:07

Re: Stacking EV with enemy inaccuracy?

Couldn't that be done a less extreme way? In particular, would there be any flavour damage to Yredelemnul simply granting umbra-vision to all his minions, i.e. all friendlies to a PC follower?

Alternately, let the profane servitors screw with their minions - Team Monster only has to be lucky once.

Return to Dungeon Crawling Advice

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 43 guests

Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group.
Designed by ST Software for PTF.