1 INT = 1 MR

[Elitist]

Because, as it stands, intelligence is by far the least versatile stat ever since strength's damage increase could be measured. This isn't game changing, but it does increase the versatility of early game warrior-mages and gives a slight bit of incentive to raise int where one otherwise might reconsider. Might be neat. Who knows.

[Arrhythmia]

1. One MR is really inconsequential. If you put every stat boost into int, you wouldn't even have a fifth of a ring of MR at the game's end.
2. I'm not sure that making int even more desirable for casters is the way to go.

[Elitist]

1. One MR is really inconsequential. If you put every stat boost into int, you wouldn't even have a fifth of a ring of MR at the game's end.
2. I'm not sure that making int even more desirable for casters is the way to go.

1. Fair. I was always taught dexterity is minor in stealth, so I figured making int minor in MR would be fitting. I think 2 would be too much, though. I'd be willing to do 1 INT = 1.5 MR rounded down.
2. Int is the weakest of the three stats to me. That being said, I don't think buffing spellcasters is such an awful idea.