Tartarus Sorceror
Posts: 1822
Joined: Thursday, 31st May 2012, 15:45
If it doesn't fit anywhere else, it belongs here. Also, come here if you just need to get hammered.
Tartarus Sorceror
Posts: 1822
Joined: Thursday, 31st May 2012, 15:45
Vestibule Violator
Posts: 1591
Joined: Saturday, 3rd August 2013, 18:59
Dungeon Master
Posts: 1051
Joined: Thursday, 12th June 2014, 05:19
Crypt Cleanser
Posts: 714
Joined: Saturday, 5th December 2015, 06:56
Slime Squisher
Posts: 354
Joined: Thursday, 14th April 2011, 17:28
Vestibule Violator
Posts: 1591
Joined: Saturday, 3rd August 2013, 18:59
PleasingFungus wrote:lmao @ the immediate "no actually you don't like x" response
Ziggurat Zagger
Posts: 6454
Joined: Tuesday, 30th October 2012, 19:06
Tiktacy wrote:Wands are just spells that you can use without a lot of skill investment, but the downside is that they are in limited supply. If I wanted to play using wands, I would just play a spellcaster.
Vestibule Violator
Posts: 1591
Joined: Saturday, 3rd August 2013, 18:59
Siegurt wrote:Tiktacy wrote:Wands are just spells that you can use without a lot of skill investment, but the downside is that they are in limited supply. If I wanted to play using wands, I would just play a spellcaster.
Well, the two sets don't *exactly* overlap, they're pretty similar, but they certainly aren't exactly the same, and they've been moving apart, rather than together (Admittedly it's still a fairly slim margin) they were closer in the past than they are presently, at any rate.
Shoals Surfer
Posts: 297
Joined: Wednesday, 9th July 2014, 08:20
Tartarus Sorceror
Posts: 1822
Joined: Thursday, 31st May 2012, 15:45
Abyss Ambulator
Posts: 1217
Joined: Sunday, 14th April 2013, 04:01
Cocytus Succeeder
Posts: 2297
Joined: Saturday, 14th April 2012, 21:35
MainiacJoe wrote:Tiktacy is correct that Pakellas is similar to a blaster build. ... Is it a bad thing if Pak exists to be easy mode for "I want to blow stuff up"?
Vestibule Violator
Posts: 1591
Joined: Saturday, 3rd August 2013, 18:59
Tartarus Sorceror
Posts: 1822
Joined: Thursday, 31st May 2012, 15:45
Tiktacy wrote:Note that I might dislike paks gameplay, but not because he is an evo go. I dislike him because doesn't let you cast spells
Blades Runner
Posts: 568
Joined: Wednesday, 5th March 2014, 03:52
Tartarus Sorceror
Posts: 1667
Joined: Saturday, 11th October 2014, 06:12
Location: Brazil. RS, Santa Cruz do Sul.
Spider Stomper
Posts: 224
Joined: Monday, 19th November 2012, 04:56
Blades Runner
Posts: 568
Joined: Wednesday, 5th March 2014, 03:52
RBrandon wrote:"A person likes it" and "should be in the game" are not always the same thing, although it is probably easy to get confused on that point after reading most of the posts in GDD.
Ziggurat Zagger
Posts: 6418
Joined: Friday, 6th July 2012, 12:48
Ziggurat Zagger
Posts: 4055
Joined: Tuesday, 10th January 2012, 19:49
Ziggurat Zagger
Posts: 5382
Joined: Friday, 25th November 2011, 07:36
Ziggurat Zagger
Posts: 4055
Joined: Tuesday, 10th January 2012, 19:49
Blades Runner
Posts: 568
Joined: Wednesday, 5th March 2014, 03:52
crate wrote:There are a couple major problems with Pakellas.
1) He includes several things that were removed from crawl in the past, presumably for reasons the devs still agree with.
Included: giving a god haste, infinite enslavement, infinite polymorph, infinite self-teleport, possibly other things
It's hard to justify removing those in the past and simultaneously including them with Pakellas.
2) He steps on the toes of several other gods
He gives you Ely's healing, Makhleb's destruction. Nemelex is already an evoker god, and there's a lot of overlap with Gozag also (partly since Nemelex and Gozag themselves have a lot of overlap).
3) Gods using evocations skill cannot be balanced.
This one is pretty easy: either evokables are only useful if you get double-duty out of the skill (from a god); or the god is too strong because evokables are already super good so you get too much for free; or the god just sucks and doesn't do anything. Nemelex kind of manages to be both of the last two, since he's actually completely useless right away but then lategame he is super strong. This also means that adjusting the power of evokables messes with the power level of the evoker gods, which is a problem. I guess there's another alternative which is to remove evocations skill entirely, which might work but probably won't happen.
The potions of magic thing and the no-MP-regen conduct are also awkward (since in practice this doesn't actually do what it was presumably intended to do), but those are more minor.
Ziggurat Zagger
Posts: 5382
Joined: Friday, 25th November 2011, 07:36
crate wrote:Evokables are fine, the problem there is that recharging scrolls probably shouldn't exist and wands of hasting and heal wounds are pretty questionable even without recharging scrolls (and indefensible with recharging).
Ziggurat Zagger
Posts: 6454
Joined: Tuesday, 30th October 2012, 19:06
tasonir wrote:crate wrote:Evokables are fine, the problem there is that recharging scrolls probably shouldn't exist and wands of hasting and heal wounds are pretty questionable even without recharging scrolls (and indefensible with recharging).
As much as I hate to admit it (because I'd rather abuse the hell out of them), I think you're probably right. Simplest solution right now would be to just completely remove recharging with no compensation, which I don't think would have any really negative side effects. Rods would be a bit weaker, you wouldn't be able to 'craft' a +9 rod, but you can still find +3 or so rods which are plenty strong.
Alternatively you could make recharging only work on rods, and about as rare as a scroll of brand weapon, so you find 1-3 or so a game, and then can only apply +3 to a rod once per game.
Tomb Titivator
Posts: 911
Joined: Thursday, 17th December 2015, 02:36
crate wrote: recharging scrolls probably shouldn't exist
tasonir wrote:Alternatively you could make recharging only work on rods, and about as rare as a scroll of brand weapon, so you find 1-3 or so a game, and then can only apply +3 to a rod once per game.
Tomb Titivator
Posts: 911
Joined: Thursday, 17th December 2015, 02:36
crate wrote:Nemelex kind of manages to be both of the last two, since he's actually completely useless right away but then lategame he is super strong.
Ziggurat Zagger
Posts: 4055
Joined: Tuesday, 10th January 2012, 19:49
Ziggurat Zagger
Posts: 4478
Joined: Wednesday, 23rd October 2013, 07:56
HardboiledGargoyle wrote:Are you sure you didn't accidentally switch-around? Because my experience with Nemelex has been the polar opposite: strong early, runs out of steam and becomes uncompetitive late.crate wrote:Nemelex kind of manages to be both of the last two, since he's actually completely useless right away but then lategame he is super strong.
Ziggurat Zagger
Posts: 6418
Joined: Friday, 6th July 2012, 12:48
HardboiledGargoyle wrote:becomes uncompetitive late
Spider Stomper
Posts: 224
Joined: Monday, 19th November 2012, 04:56
Ziggurat Zagger
Posts: 6418
Joined: Friday, 6th July 2012, 12:48
Ziggurat Zagger
Posts: 4055
Joined: Tuesday, 10th January 2012, 19:49
Tomb Titivator
Posts: 853
Joined: Thursday, 29th August 2013, 18:39
duvessa wrote:rod recharging isn't problematic in the way that wand recharging is, but rod recharging alone is not enough reason to keep ?recharging in the game
Tartarus Sorceror
Posts: 1822
Joined: Thursday, 31st May 2012, 15:45
Tartarus Sorceror
Posts: 1822
Joined: Thursday, 31st May 2012, 15:45
crate wrote:There are a couple major problems with Pakellas.
[snip]
It's fine if you like Pakellas as a player. You don't have to be concerned with these design problems (especially #1). If you have fun, great; I actually sort of enjoy Pakellas myself despite caring a lot more about design concerns than like 99.5% of all crawl players. His design is pretty bad though.
Tartarus Sorceror
Posts: 1822
Joined: Thursday, 31st May 2012, 15:45
johlstei wrote:duvessa wrote:rod recharging isn't problematic in the way that wand recharging is, but rod recharging alone is not enough reason to keep ?recharging in the game
Allowing ?enchant weapon to work on rods would be fine here I think.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 100 guests