Barkeep
Posts: 1788
Joined: Saturday, 29th June 2013, 16:52
Re: Ban sarcasm for good players
Currently, the line is set at "personal attacks." Note, for example, that duvessa just called an argument stupid; is that a personal attack? At what point does criticizing someone's argument or tone rise to the level of an actionable personal attack?
What kind of rule could even be enacted that would address chequers critique of terse advice? When does terseness become uncivil? How about snark? Does it matter if the statement is correct?
As Wikipedia's internal struggles with "civility" show, it's hard to regulate. My idea of civility may be far more strict or lenient than someone else's. Indeed, if you've read this thread, you should already have a very good idea that every single poster here has a different idea of what counts as "civil" and "uncivil." Indeed, it seems super clear that some people are complaining because they find someone else's behavior to be annoying, and it's hard to imagine how you'd craft a rule that prevents people from getting on each other's nerves.
Which is all to say that I'm not sure there's a very useful way to adjudicate this stuff in a way that's even remotely fair, and that the only answer involves people learning to live with their digital neighbors with a measure of good humor. This is, after all, a video game forum.
e: also, I'm on a borrowed tablet, otherwise I'd split off the substantive parts of this discussion to Suggestions & Criticism. If another mod happens to see this before I get to a computer, feel free to do so.