0008291: Accidental necromutation behaves strangely for undead

Viewing Issue Simple Details [ Jump to Notes ] [ Wiki ]

[ View Advanced ] [ Issue History ] [ Print ]

Category

Severity

Reproducibility

Date Submitted

Last Update

0008291

[DCSS] Bug Report

minor

N/A

2014-03-18 14:25

2014-03-19 07:09

Reporter

dpeg

View Status

public

Assigned To

neil

Priority

normal

Resolution

duplicate

Status

closed

Product Branch

0.14 ancient branch

Summary

0008291: Accidental necromutation behaves strangely for undead

Description

This is a report based on the email of ??? to the c-r-d mailing list from March 9, 2014.

"The bug is, when we play vampire, mummy, ghoul we could necromutation by
weapons of chaos or Xom's play. That's enough for notice. But when necromution ends, we are NOT UNDEAD anymore!"

Two other minor bugs (yes, they shouldn't really go here, but it's a strange situation):

"There's a vampire wearing Sword of Jihad, even beliving Shining One."

"The player of this also said he resolved food problem of vampire by casting
necromutation.(In normal situation they couldn't cast it)"

http://1.bp.blogspot.com/-WEOZwESlj2w/Um67_4GSaCI/AAAAAAAAJ5I/R5SlwLEws2w/s1 [^]
600/VpCj+(2829).jpg
http://3.bp.blogspot.com/-Zt0ap_Cckm8/Um68BR5JzbI/AAAAAAAAJ5I/Tc_REOquPt0/s1 [^]
600/VpCj+(2834).jpg

Additional Information

Tags

No tags attached.

Attached Files

Relationships

duplicate of

0007668

closed

neil

Vampire lose undead trait once coming back from lich form

Notes
(0025650) neil (administrator) 2014-03-18 14:48	Necromutation expiration restoring undead to life should be fixed in 0.14-a0-398-g2ef00a3. Vampires being necomutated by chaos or Xom should be fixed by 0.14-a0-409-gaecfd6b I'm not aware of this having been possible for mummies or ghouls, since they are unconditionally prevented from undergoing any transformations.

(0025651) dpeg (administrator) 2014-03-18 14:50	I am fully aware that a trunk version hash would have helped a lot, but we didn't gone one. So this can be closed, I guess?

(0025657) neil (administrator) 2014-03-19 07:09	I think so, yes.

Issue History
Date Modified	Username	Field	Change
2014-03-18 14:25	dpeg	New Issue
2014-03-18 14:48	neil	Note Added: 0025650
2014-03-18 14:50	dpeg	Note Added: 0025651
2014-03-19 07:09	neil	Note Added: 0025657
2014-03-19 07:09	neil	Relationship added	duplicate of 0007668
2014-03-19 07:09	neil	Duplicate ID	0 => 7668
2014-03-19 07:09	neil	Status	new => resolved
2014-03-19 07:09	neil	Fixed in Branch	=> 0.14 development branch
2014-03-19 07:09	neil	Resolution	open => duplicate
2014-03-19 07:09	neil	Assigned To	=> neil
2014-03-19 07:09	neil	Status	resolved => closed

Mantis 1.1.8[^]