Viewing Issue Simple Details Jump to Notes ] Wiki ] View Advanced ] Issue History ] Print ]
ID Category Severity Reproducibility Date Submitted Last Update
0007855 [DCSS] Bug Report minor have not tried 2013-12-12 03:39 2013-12-12 07:58
Reporter elliptic View Status public  
Assigned To neil
Priority normal Resolution done  
Status resolved   Product Branch 0.14 ancient branch
Summary 0007855: Autoexplore is stuck.
Description Autoexplore refuses to continue. I am on top of a stack of items, including some chunks that would burden me; it should be prompting me to continue exploring, but instead it is just printing "Partly explored, can't reach some items and places." (with no exclusions on the map). Savefile: [^]
Additional Information
Tags No tags attached.
Attached Files

- Relationships
has duplicate 0006386resolvedneil autoexplore gets stuck; maybe involving useless {=g} items 

-  Notes
neil (administrator)
2013-12-12 04:00
edited on: 2013-12-12 04:00

I get the same thing regardless of autosacrifice, but turning off pickup with ctrl-a does in fact "fix" it.

neil (administrator)
2013-12-12 04:43
edited on: 2013-12-12 05:27

Hmm... so in _explore_find_target square it chooses your pos as whereto (the next destination for explore) because of greed. That's fine, but pathfind has set the travel_point_distance to that square to 0. In fact, only four squares on the entire map have a nonzero distance: the ones to your NE, SW, SW twice, and SW then S.

In a game where this doesn't occur, the travel_point_distance to the player's position is 2. Likewise, if in your save I move one square NE then move back, the pathfind results look reasonable (and it comes unstuck).

Edit: it seems to have something to do with the unexplored cell two squares to the east. That causes path_examine_point to return true for the northeast cell, meaning it decides it has a destination before actually pathfinding to the player's location. But greedy_place is already set to the player's position by that point (and is closer than unexplored_place), so explore_target returns a cell with a travel_point_distance of 0 (unreached), which makes _explore_find_target square reject the location.

neil (administrator)
2013-12-12 05:53

I can reproduce this reliably with the following setup, where your position (@) has an autopickup item and the position marked ? is unexplored. It doesn't matter whether the item can be picked up, just that it hasn't yet been.
neil (administrator)
2013-12-12 06:11
edited on: 2013-12-12 07:59

Fixed in trunk (0.14-a0-1444-g21dc12d) and stable (0.13.1-16-g807a372).

- Issue History
Date Modified Username Field Change
2013-12-12 03:39 elliptic New Issue
2013-12-12 04:00 neil Note Added: 0024705
2013-12-12 04:00 neil Note Edited: 0024705
2013-12-12 04:43 neil Note Added: 0024706
2013-12-12 05:27 neil Note Edited: 0024706
2013-12-12 05:27 neil Note Edited: 0024706
2013-12-12 05:53 neil Note Added: 0024708
2013-12-12 06:11 neil Note Added: 0024711
2013-12-12 06:11 neil Status new => resolved
2013-12-12 06:11 neil Fixed in Branch => 0.14 development branch
2013-12-12 06:11 neil Resolution open => done
2013-12-12 06:11 neil Assigned To => neil
2013-12-12 07:03 neil Relationship added has duplicate 0006386
2013-12-12 07:58 neil Fixed in Branch 0.14 development branch => 0.13 stable branch
2013-12-12 07:59 neil Note Edited: 0024711

Mantis 1.1.8[^]
Copyright © 2000 - 2009 Mantis Group
Powered by Mantis Bugtracker